On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 18:18 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:19 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index
> > entails
> > many such calls. A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
> > leading to inc
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:19 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index entails
> many such calls. A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
> leading to increased performance.
>
> On my repo, which has an index size of 30m, this saves about 10ms of
>
Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index entails
many such calls. A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
leading to increased performance.
On my repo, which has an index size of 30m, this saves about 10ms of
time writing the index.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
read-
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2016-03-19 02.19, David Turner wrote:
>> Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index entails
>> many such calls. A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
>> leading to increased performance.
>>
>> On my repo, wh
On 2016-03-19 02.19, David Turner wrote:
> Each write() has syscall overhead, and writing a large index entails
> many such calls. A larger write buffer reduces the overhead,
> leading to increased performance.
>
> On my repo, which has an index size of 30m, this saves about 10ms of
> time writin
5 matches
Mail list logo
