On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:52:10AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > Yeah, it is. You can do it easily with 'sed', of course, but if you want
> > to avoid the extra process and do it in pure shell, it's more like:
> >
> > last38=${REV#??}
> > first2=${REV%$last38}
> > rm -f .git/objects/$firs
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:42:22AM +0100, André Laszlo wrote:
> git pull --rebase on a corrupted HEAD used to segfault;it has been
> corrected to error out with a message. A test has also been added to
> verify this fix.
Your commit message mostly tells us the "what" that we can see from the
diff
Am 06.03.2017 um 04:51 schrieb Jeff King:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 11:52:22PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:42:22AM +0100, André Laszlo wrote:
+test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase with corrupt HEAD does not segfault' '
+ mkdir corrupted &&
+ (cd corrup
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 11:52:22PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:42:22AM +0100, André Laszlo wrote:
> > +test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase with corrupt HEAD does not
> > segfault' '
> > + mkdir corrupted &&
> > + (cd corrupted &&
> > + git init &&
> > +
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:42:22AM +0100, André Laszlo wrote:
> +test_expect_success 'git pull --rebase with corrupt HEAD does not segfault' '
> + mkdir corrupted &&
> + (cd corrupted &&
> + git init &&
> + echo one >file && git add file &&
> + git commit -m one &&
> + REV=$
git pull --rebase on a corrupted HEAD used to segfault; it has been
corrected to error out with a message. A test has also been added to
verify this fix.
Signed-off-by: André Laszlo
---
Notes:
When add_head_to_pending fails to add a pending object, git pull
--rebase segfaults. This can h
6 matches
Mail list logo
