Jeff King writes:
> Since the discussion seemed to end up in this "let's make PKT-LINE more
> clear" direction, here is an attempt to do that.
Ah, I was confused while reading the other one ;-)
Will queue this one instead. Thanks.
> -- >8 --
> Subject: pack-protocol: clarify LF-handling in PK
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:24:09AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-common.txt
> b/Documentation/technical/protocol-common.txt
> index 889985f..bf30167 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-common.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-common
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:02:05AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I'm also tempted to scrap this and say it just falls under the rule
> that every PKT-LINE is "sender SHOULD include LF" and "receiver MUST NOT
> complain about missing LF" (which does appear earlier in the document,
> though in a differe
3 matches
Mail list logo