On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:49:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
> > I keep tripping over this "real_type vs type" in this code. What do
> > you think about renaming "type" field to "in_pack_type" and
> > "real_type" to "canon_type" (or "final_type")? "Real" does not really
Duy Nguyen writes:
> I keep tripping over this "real_type vs type" in this code. What do
> you think about renaming "type" field to "in_pack_type" and
> "real_type" to "canon_type" (or "final_type")? "Real" does not really
> say anything in this context..
An unqualified name "type" does bother m
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
> 2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
> one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
> ofs-deltas separately.
>
> In fix_unres
Junio C Hamano writes:
> When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
> 2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
> one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
> ofs-deltas separately.
>
> In fix_unresolved_deltas(), however it for
When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
ofs-deltas separately.
In fix_unresolved_deltas(), however it forgot that it now wants to
look only a
5 matches
Mail list logo
