Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
>> packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
>> messages for each signature separately. However, git currently does not
>> account for such scenario a
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 14:31 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> It's not clear to me that the name is_status or SIGNATURE_STATUS
>> captures what this field represents. Aren't these all sigcheck
>> statuses? Can you describe briefly what distinguishes the cases where
>> this s
On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 14:31 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
> > packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
> > messages for each signature separately. However, git currently doe
Michał Górny wrote:
> GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
> packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
> messages for each signature separately. However, git currently does not
> account for such scenario and gets terribly confused over ge
4 matches
Mail list logo