Thanks a lot, Jeff, your explanation really helped!
--
Regards,
Stanislav
On 24/03/16 20:02, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Stanislav Kolotinskiy wrote:
Thanks for noticing; the above explanation however does not make it
very clear why the symptom exhibits itself o
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Stanislav Kolotinskiy wrote:
> >Thanks for noticing; the above explanation however does not make it
> >very clear why the symptom exhibits itself only when "directory" is
> >given (it also is unclear if "target" being a directory is special,
> >or if any r
On 24/03/16 19:37, Jeff King wrote:
I guess a follow-up to my question is: what does "git send-pack" do that
"git push" does not? Again, this is just for my curiosity (the answer
may be "nothing, we just happened to build our scripts around
send-pack", and that is perfectly fine).
Well, this is s
On 24/03/16 18:11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Please see "git shortlog --no-merges" output from recent history and
notice that s/Fix/fix/ would make things more consistent.
Thanks for letting me know, I'll update that.
Thanks for noticing; the above explanation however does not make it
very clear wh
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Stanislav Kolotinskiy wrote:
> On 23/03/16 23:22, Jeff King wrote:
> >Not that it matters for this bug, but for my own curiosity, what do you
> >use "send-pack --all" for? I've generally assumed that nobody directly
> >calls send-pack themselves these days
Stanislav Kolotinskiy writes:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-send-pack: Fix --all option when used with directory
Please see "git shortlog --no-merges" output from recent history and
notice that s/Fix/fix/ would make things more consistent.
> When using git send-pack with --all opt
On 23/03/16 23:22, Jeff King wrote:
Not that it matters for this bug, but for my own curiosity, what do you
use "send-pack --all" for? I've generally assumed that nobody directly
calls send-pack themselves these days, but of course we have no data to
support that either way. So I am always intere
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:22:13PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > diff --git a/t/t9904-send-pack-all.sh b/t/t9904-send-pack-all.sh
>
> The tests are roughly grouped by functionality. send-pack tests are in
> the t540x range, and this should probably go there. Though I also
> suspect it could easily
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:24:22PM +0200, Stanislav Kolotinskiy wrote:
> When using git send-pack with --all option
> and a target directory, usage message is being
> displayed instead of performing the actual transmission.
Yeah, that seems very wrong.
Not that it matters for this bug, but for m
When using git send-pack with --all option
and a target directory, usage message is being
displayed instead of performing the actual transmission.
The reason for this issue is that refspecs variable is being
calculated in a different way comparing to previous versions,
and even though the number o
10 matches
Mail list logo
