Re: [PATCH] git-pasky spec file

Chris Wright wrote: > Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds. (snip) > Creates a package named git, which seems > fine since Linus' isn't likely to be packaged directly. Um. Really? I can't imagine why Linus's git wouldn't be packaged directly. He has strongly indicated that folks who want

Re: [PATCH] git-pasky spec file

* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:55:21AM CEST, I got a letter > where Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds. It's against the > > latest Makefile (which has the s/BINDIR/bindir/ change). I'v

Re: [PATCH] git-pasky spec file

Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:55:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds. It's against the > latest Makefile (which has the s/BINDIR/bindir/ change). I've used > DESTDIR, although it's not clear it's me

[PATCH] git-pasky spec file

Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds. It's against the latest Makefile (which has the s/BINDIR/bindir/ change). I've used DESTDIR, although it's not clear it's meant to stay in the Makefile. For now, there's no dynamic (git.spec.in, for example) update to the Version, so it's set against 0.