Hi Michael,
On 2015-05-29 11:53, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 26.05.2015 14:35:
>> For what it is worth, I tried my hand a couple of years ago at the project
>> to move git-new-workdir to use the `.git` *file* and alternates mechanisms,
>> but that does not w
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Isn't that basically the approach that "git checkout --to" is taking? Is
> that one "Windows proof"?
It should be.
> I've lost track of its status, though.
It should be fine to use as long as you don't do checkout --to on a
submodule. S
Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 26.05.2015 14:35:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2015-05-26 14:20, Paul Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>> The biggest problem with `mklink` is that it is only supported on
>>> Windows Vista and later, while I really like to
Hi Daniel,
On 2015-05-26 19:16, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for reviewing my proposed patch an providing valuable
> feedback. This was my first patch submission to a large open source project
> like Git and the whole process was a little daunting.
Heh, yeah, it can be quite overwhelm
Am 26.05.2015 um 06:03 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Daniel Smith writes:
>
>> When running on Windows in MinGW, creating symbolic links via ln always
>> failed.
>>
>> Using mklink instead of ln is the recommended method of creating links on
>> Windows:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18641864/
Hi,
On 2015-05-26 06:03, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Daniel Smith writes:
>
>> When running on Windows in MinGW, creating symbolic links via ln always
>> failed.
>>
>> Using mklink instead of ln is the recommended method of creating links on
>> Windows:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18641864
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> The biggest problem with `mklink` is that it is only supported on
> Windows Vista and later, while I really like to keep Windows XP
> support in Git for Windows.
No, the biggest problem with mklink is that you have to have
administrat
Hi Paul,
On 2015-05-26 14:20, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> The biggest problem with `mklink` is that it is only supported on
>> Windows Vista and later, while I really like to keep Windows XP
>> support in Git for Windows.
>
> No, the bigges
Daniel Smith writes:
> When running on Windows in MinGW, creating symbolic links via ln always
> failed.
>
> Using mklink instead of ln is the recommended method of creating links on
> Windows:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18641864/git-bash-shell-fails-to-create-symbolic-links
>
> Script
9 matches
Mail list logo
