Re: [PATCH] fixup! rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostash

2013-05-29 Thread Matthieu Moy
Junio C Hamano writes: > Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > >> For rr/rebase-autostash, which is stalled in pu. See $gmane/225689. >> >> This is a super-minor fix anyway: if you disagree with something, change >> it; there's no need to ask me. > > As I wasn't the one who were disagreeing, that woul

Re: [PATCH] fixup! rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostash

2013-05-29 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: > As I wasn't the one who were disagreeing, that would not work > well. I meant in the tiny details like echo + gettext versus gettext. >From the review of v3, nobody had any disagreements; just minor suggestions: that's what this patch is about anyway. -- To unsubscribe fro

Re: [PATCH] fixup! rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostash

2013-05-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > For rr/rebase-autostash, which is stalled in pu. See $gmane/225689. > > This is a super-minor fix anyway: if you disagree with something, change > it; there's no need to ask me. As I wasn't the one who were disagreeing, that would not work well. Was there anybody

[PATCH] fixup! rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostash

2013-05-29 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
For rr/rebase-autostash, which is stalled in pu. See $gmane/225689. This is a super-minor fix anyway: if you disagree with something, change it; there's no need to ask me. As for the follow-up introducing a 'stash store', I will submit it in good time: there's no hurry. I'm working on some othe