Jeff King writes:
> Before, if (!one && !two) we would call contains(two, ...), and now we
> will simply assume it is zero. Which I think is an improvement, as we
> would have segfaulted before. I don't think it is a bug in the current
> code (we would not ever feed the function two NULLs), but i
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 03:53:27PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Halve the number of callsites of contains() to two using temporary
> variables, simplifying the code. While at it, get rid of the
> diff_options parameter, which became unused with 8fa4b09f.
There is a slight change in behavior, too
Halve the number of callsites of contains() to two using temporary
variables, simplifying the code. While at it, get rid of the
diff_options parameter, which became unused with 8fa4b09f.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe
---
diffcore-pickaxe.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 dele
3 matches
Mail list logo