On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:26:24AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > As discussed there, I do think this only solves half the problem, as the
> > smudge filter has the same issue in reverse. That's more complicated to
> > fix, and AFAIK nobody is working on it. But I don't t
Jeff King writes:
> As discussed there, I do think this only solves half the problem, as the
> smudge filter has the same issue in reverse. That's more complicated to
> fix, and AFAIK nobody is working on it. But I don't think there's any
> reason not to pick up this part in the meantime.
Yeah,
From: Joey Hess
We write the output of a "clean" filter into a strbuf. Rather than
growing the strbuf dynamically as we read its output, we make the
initial allocation as large as the original input file. This is a good
guess when the filter is just tweaking a few bytes, but it's disastrous
when
3 matches
Mail list logo
