Marcus Brinkmann writes:
>> Are you still able to do a re-roll on this?
>
> I have to admit that my interest has declined steeply since
> discovering that subtree-split and filter-branch --subtree-filter give
> different results from "git svn" on the subdirectory. The reason is
> that git-svn in
On 01/28/2016 03:56 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann writes:
With my patch, "git subtree split -P" produces the same result (for my
data set) as "git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter", which is much
faster, because it selects the revisions to rewrite before rewriting.
As I am not
Marcus Brinkmann writes:
> With my patch, "git subtree split -P" produces the same result (for my
> data set) as "git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter", which is much
> faster, because it selects the revisions to rewrite before rewriting.
> As I am not using any of the advanced features of "gi
[ Sorry it took a few days to reply. I am absolutely slammed at work
and will be for the next few weeks at least. The good news is that
it's resulting in some nice work on git-subtree! :) ]
Marcus Brinkmann writes:
> On 01/20/2016 05:05 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
>> Marcus Brinkmann writ
With my patch, "git subtree split -P" produces the same result (for my
data set) as "git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter", which is much
faster, because it selects the revisions to rewrite before rewriting.
As I am not using any of the advanced features of "git subtree", I will
just use "git fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
