Re: [PATCH] completion: verify-tag is not plumbing

2016-02-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Keeping writes: > I can accept that argument about verify-commit and verify-tag, but > listing verify-tag as plumbing is incorrect according to > command-list.txt (and thus git(1)). If we're going to classify > commands, shouldn't we be consistent in how we do so? These are not meant to be

Re: [PATCH] completion: verify-tag is not plumbing

2016-02-01 Thread John Keeping
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:37:59PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > Quoting John Keeping : > > > According to command-list.txt, verify-tag is an ancillary interrogator, > > which means that it should be completed by "git verify-" in the > > same way as verify-commit. > > > > Remove it from the list

Re: [PATCH] completion: verify-tag is not plumbing

2016-01-31 Thread SZEDER Gábor
Quoting John Keeping : According to command-list.txt, verify-tag is an ancillary interrogator, which means that it should be completed by "git verify-" in the same way as verify-commit. Remove it from the list of plumbing commands so that it is treated as porcelain and completed. I'm not sur

[PATCH] completion: verify-tag is not plumbing

2016-01-31 Thread John Keeping
According to command-list.txt, verify-tag is an ancillary interrogator, which means that it should be completed by "git verify-" in the same way as verify-commit. Remove it from the list of plumbing commands so that it is treated as porcelain and completed. Signed-off-by: John Keeping --- contr