On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:50 AM Ben Avison wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2019 12:31, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:46 AM Ben Avison wrote:
> >>
> >> When using `git clone --recurse-submodules` there was previously no way to
> >> pass a `--remote` switch to the implicit `git submodule upd
On 16/05/2019 12:31, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:46 AM Ben Avison wrote:
When using `git clone --recurse-submodules` there was previously no way to
pass a `--remote` switch to the implicit `git submodule update` command for
any use case where you want the submodules to be check
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:46 AM Ben Avison wrote:
>
> When using `git clone --recurse-submodules` there was previously no way to
> pass a `--remote` switch to the implicit `git submodule update` command for
> any use case where you want the submodules to be checked out on their
> remote-tracking b
On 13/05/2019 22:12, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Mon, May 13 2019, Ben Avison wrote:
+ if (option_remote_submodules == 1) {
I see you copied this from code above the context, but to check a bool
variable just use "if (var)" not "if (var == 1)".
OK. Would you prefer I ed
On Mon, May 13 2019, Ben Avison wrote:
> @@ -792,6 +795,11 @@ static int checkout(int submodule_progress)
> if (option_verbosity < 0)
> argv_array_push(&args, "--quiet");
>
> + if (option_remote_submodules == 1) {
I see you copied this from code a
When using `git clone --recurse-submodules` there was previously no way to
pass a `--remote` switch to the implicit `git submodule update` command for
any use case where you want the submodules to be checked out on their
remote-tracking branch rather than with the SHA-1 recorded in the superproject
6 matches
Mail list logo
