David Turner writes:
> On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 13:47 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> David Turner writes:
>>
>> > When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
>> > and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
>> > its cache-tree populated. This
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 13:47 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
> > and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
> > its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git statu
David Turner writes:
> Git checkout $branch already populates the cache-tree; this is due to
> patches I added last year:
>
> commit aecf567cbfb6ab46e82f7f5df36fb6a2dd5bee69
Heh, our mails crossed ;-)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a mes
David Turner writes:
> When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
> and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
> its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git status and
> commit commands faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
>
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 13:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > David Turner writes:
> >
> >> The work done to produce the cache-tree is work that the commit would
> >> otherwise have to do. So we're spending extra time in one place to
> >> eliminate that work in a diffe
Junio C Hamano writes:
> David Turner writes:
>
>> The work done to produce the cache-tree is work that the commit would
>> otherwise have to do. So we're spending extra time in one place to
>> eliminate that work in a different place.
>
> Good point. Thanks.
Hmm, I forgot about another codep
David Turner writes:
> The work done to produce the cache-tree is work that the commit would
> otherwise have to do. So we're spending extra time in one place to
> eliminate that work in a different place.
Good point. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 12:50 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
> > and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
> > its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git statu
David Turner writes:
> When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
> and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
> its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git status and
> commit commands faster.
Wouldn't it make repeated calls to
When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old index
and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this index has
its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git status and
commit commands faster.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
Signed-off-by: Brian Degenhardt
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
