On 18/01/17 23:05, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 01/18, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Brandon,
>>
>> If you need to re-roll your 'bw/attr' branch, could you please
>> squash this into the relevant patch (commit 8908457159,
>> "attr: use hashmap for attribut
On 01/18, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
> ---
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> If you need to re-roll your 'bw/attr' branch, could you please
> squash this into the relevant patch (commit 8908457159,
> "attr: use hashmap for attribute dictionary", 12-01-2017).
>
> Also, I note that, a
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
Hi Brandon,
If you need to re-roll your 'bw/attr' branch, could you please
squash this into the relevant patch (commit 8908457159,
"attr: use hashmap for attribute dictionary", 12-01-2017).
Also, I note that, although they are declared as part of the
public attr
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
> ---
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> If you need to re-roll your 'sb/attr' branch, could you please
> squash this into the relevant patch.
will do. I have it applied locally
>
> Alternatively, since there is only a single
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
Hi Stefan,
If you need to re-roll your 'sb/attr' branch, could you please
squash this into the relevant patch.
Alternatively, since there is only a single call site for git_attr()
(on line #1005), you could perhaps remove git_attr() and inline that
call. (Howeve
5 matches
Mail list logo