Hi,
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> While I agree there should be a graceful way to go back to the
> original head from a failed merge situation, I do not think
> "committing the current HEAD" is the right model for the end
> user to think about it.
>
> Wouldn't using "checkout -f" t
While I agree there should be a graceful way to go back to the
original head from a failed merge situation, I do not think
"committing the current HEAD" is the right model for the end
user to think about it.
Wouldn't using "checkout -f" to revert to the version you would
want to go back work as ex
Sometimes a failed automatic merge means that we do not want those
changes. In this case, it is desirable to commit the current HEAD (as if
actually something was merged).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
git-commit-script |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertion
3 matches
Mail list logo