On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
+action = "noop" / "ls-remote" / "fetch" / "push" /
"fetch-shallow"
>> ...
>>> If we are going in this "in-protocol message switches the service"
>>> route, we should also support "archive" as on
Stefan Beller writes:
>>> +action = "noop" / "ls-remote" / "fetch" / "push" /
>>> "fetch-shallow"
> ...
>> If we are going in this "in-protocol message switches the service"
>> route, we should also support "archive" as one of the actions, no?
>> Yes, I know you named the document "pac
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
>> It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
>> squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
>> between versio
Stefan Beller writes:
> This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
> It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
> squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
> between version 1 and 2 all the time.
Just a handful of random thoughts, with
This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
between version 1 and 2 all the time.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
As we discussed at Git Merge in P
5 matches
Mail list logo
