Johannes Schindelin writes:
> I feel a bit talked to my hand, as the only reply I was graced was a "I
> think I already did". So this will be my last reply on this matter for a
> while.
Ah, I meant this thing:
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqo9rrqp3l@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com
I got an
Hi Junio,
I feel a bit talked to my hand, as the only reply I was graced was a "I
think I already did". So this will be my last reply on this matter for a
while.
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> IIUC, you will need "$GIT_EXEC_PATH/git-checkout" on the filesystem if
> you want your "gi
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> So I would love to hear the arguments for keeping the dashed forms of
> builtins, even if the only surviving argument may be "I dig in my feet
> because I always said we'd keep them".
I think I already did ;-)
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Forney writes:
>
> > This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
> > installed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> > ---
> > It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
> > `ma
Michael Forney writes:
> However, I still think the patch should be applied for
> self-consistency at least (git-submodule.sh currently calls both `git
> rev-parse` and `git-rev-parse`).
Oh, there is no question about the changes in the patch being good,
as I already said. We want to make sure
On 8/7/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Just to avoid possible confusion, the above is not to say "once it
> is decided, you are not allowed to bring fresh arguments to the
> discussion". As Peff said [*2*] in that old discussion thread, the
> circumstances may have changed over 9 years, and it may be
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Earlier there was a more ambitious proposal to remove all "git-foo"
> even from $GIT_EXEC_PATH for built-in commands, but that plan was
> scuttled [*1*].
>
> The changes in your patch still are good changes to make sure people
> who copy & paste code would see fewer insta
Michael Forney writes:
> This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
> installed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> ---
> It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
> `make remove-dashes`). These are just a few I noticed were still left in th
Michael Forney writes:
> Ah. Well, it looks like all but git-merge-resolve.sh run `.
> git-sh-setup`, so we know that GIT_EXEC_PATH must in their PATH (and
> at the front unless the script was invoked directly).
>
> git-merge-resolve.sh does not do this, so I suppose if the user ran
> $GIT_EXEC_P
On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Forney writes:
>> On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling
>>> 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found
>>> in the bog standard place (i.e. GIT_EXEC_PATH)?
>>>
>>> The
Michael Forney writes:
> On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling
>> 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found
>> in the bog standard place (i.e. GIT_EXEC_PATH)?
>>
>> The reason I ask is because we can rest assur
Hi Junio,
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Forney writes:
>
> > This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
> > installed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> > ---
> > It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
> > `ma
On 8/5/17, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Have you made sure that all of these scripts, before calling
> 'git-foo' in the current code, update their PATH so that these found
> in the bog standard place (i.e. GIT_EXEC_PATH)?
>
> The reason I ask is because we can rest assured these changes will
> be a no-
Michael Forney writes:
> This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
> installed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> ---
> It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
> `make remove-dashes`). These are just a few I noticed were still left in th
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Michael Forney wrote:
> This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
> installed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
> ---
> It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
> `make remove-dashes`). These are just a few
This way, they still work even if the built-in symlinks aren't
installed.
Signed-off-by: Michael Forney
---
It looks like there was an effort to do this a number of years ago (through
`make remove-dashes`). These are just a few I noticed were still left in the
.sh scripts.
git-merge-octopus.sh
16 matches
Mail list logo
