On 03.04.2013 22:07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I see why duplicates are bad, but does that mean not having any is
> better?
I'd say yes: duplicate anchors cause current versions of texinfo to
reject the document outright, and older versions will likely cause a
broken interpretation of any anchor nam
Martin von Gagern writes:
> This keeps texinfo 5.x happy. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/464210.
I see why duplicates are bad, but does that mean not having any is
better?
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin von Gagern
> ---
> Documentation/cat-texi.perl | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --
This keeps texinfo 5.x happy. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/464210.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Gagern
---
Documentation/cat-texi.perl | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/cat-texi.perl b/Documentation/cat-texi.perl
index dbc133c..b52660d 100755
--- a/Documentation/cat-t
3 matches
Mail list logo