I give up. Bye.
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 18:35 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach writes:
>
> >
> > I'm sorry, somehow my email client deleted half of your message when I saved
> > it
> > when replying. I only noticed this when wanting to delete your email and
> > noticed
> > that
Christoph Michelbach writes:
> I'm sorry, somehow my email client deleted half of your message when I saved
> it
> when replying. I only noticed this when wanting to delete your email and
> noticed
> that it was pretty long.
Please separate your discussion from the patch proper. Check
Documen
I'm sorry, somehow my email client deleted half of your message when I saved it
when replying. I only noticed this when wanting to delete your email and noticed
that it was pretty long.
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 18:55 -0
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 18:55 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach writes:
> > From: Christoph Michelbach
> > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:49:57 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Doc./git-checkout: correct doc. of checkout
> > ...
> >
> > The previous documentation states that the named paths
Christoph Michelbach writes:
>> Care to send in a patch to update the documentation?
Thanks. The attached patch text appears linewrapped, but I think
I'll be able to salvage, so forgetting about the formatting, here
are some comments.
> From: Christoph Michelbach
> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Christoph Michelbach writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Obviously, "grab all paths that match out of ,
> > > add
> > > them to the index and copy them out to the working tree" wi
t;Christoph Michelbach" ; "Git Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout
clearer
"Philip Oakley" writes:
I'd guess that the misunderstanding is that you maybe thought that the
whol
From: "Junio C Hamano" Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017
1:31 AM
"Philip Oakley" writes:
If we'd created and added a file d just before the checkout, what
should
have happened to d, and why?
I understand what the command does. It behaves perfectly as I expected
it to. I did not find this scr
Christoph Michelbach writes:
> On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Obviously, "grab all paths that match out of , add
>> them to the index and copy them out to the working tree" will never
>> be able to _restore_ the lack of 'd', even it may match the
>> being used to
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:31 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Philip Oakley" writes:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If we'd created and added a file d just before the checkout,
> > > > what
> > > > should
> > > > have happened to d, and why?
> > > I understand what the command does. It behaves perf
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:26 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Philip Oakley" writes:
>
> >
> > I'd guess that the misunderstanding is that you maybe thought that
> > the
> > whole directory would be reset to it's old state and the files b and
> > c
> > deleted, rather than just the named files pre
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 21:59 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> I've added back the list, as it was accidentally dropped.
Thanks. I'm sorry. I apparently pressed the wrong button in my emails
client. What I wrote is visible in your quote.
> From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> > I understand what the comma
"Philip Oakley" writes:
>>> If we'd created and added a file d just before the checkout, what
>>> should
>>> have happened to d, and why?
>>
>> I understand what the command does. It behaves perfectly as I expected
>> it to. I did not find this script but wrote it to demonstrate that what
>> the
"Philip Oakley" writes:
> I'd guess that the misunderstanding is that you maybe thought that the
> whole directory would be reset to it's old state and the files b and c
> deleted, rather than just the named files present in that old commit
> being extracted. If we'd created and added a file d ju
I've added back the list, as it was accidentally dropped.
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:04 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
>
> On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 22:25 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> >
> > From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> > >
> > > It's: git c
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 22:25 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> It's: git checkout [-p|--patch] [] [--] ...
The one I quoted is direct from the Synopsis, which does indicate
there are
potentially more aspects to resolve, such as the influence
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 22:25 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> > It's: git checkout [-p|--patch] [] [--] ...
> The one I quoted is direct from the Synopsis, which does indicate
> there are
> potentially more aspects to resolve, such as the influence of using
> the
> [-p
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 19:03 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
>
> On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> >
> > From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> > >
> > >
> > > While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
>
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 19:03 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
> > > > introdu
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
>
> While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
> introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
> not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 00:28 +0100, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Christoph Michelbach"
> >
> > While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
> > introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
> > not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically
> > point
From: "Christoph Michelbach"
While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically
pointed out.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Michelbach
---
Documentation/git-checkout.
While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
introduced by a checkout are staged automatically, was
not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically
pointed out.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Michelbach
---
Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 7 ---
1 file changed
23 matches
Mail list logo
