Ben Walton writes:
> Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
> semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
> of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
> see string2 padded to the length of string1 using the final chara
Ignore this version. The immediate followup quotes PERL_PATH.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
> semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
> of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD se
Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
see string2 padded to the length of string1 using the final character
in string2. POSIX explic
Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
see string2 padded to the length of string1 using the final character
in string2. POSIX explic
Ben Walton writes:
> Per the other discussion about replacing all PERL_PATH with a shell
> function named perl, should I update this patch to use $PERL_PATH in
> the meantime so that it can be batch updated when the function is
> added in a separate patch?
Yeah, sounds like a good plan, and very
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> I'm happy to defer to your judgement on this - If you'd like the tests
> wrapped, I'll do so.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>>
>>> Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>>
In other
I'm happy to defer to your judgement on this - If you'd like the tests
wrapped, I'll do so.
Thanks
-Ben
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
>> Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>
>>> In other tests, we check for prerequisite PERL, i.e., we are prepared
>>> tha
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> In other tests, we check for prerequisite PERL, i.e., we are prepared
>> that perl is not available. Shouldn't we do that here, too?
>
> I think the tests assume there's a perl present even when the PERL
> prereq isn't present already. E.g.:
>
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> In other tests, we check for prerequisite PERL, i.e., we are prepared
> that perl is not available. Shouldn't we do that here, too?
I think the tests assume there's a perl present even when the PERL
prereq isn't present already. E.g.:
nul_to_q () {
Am 28.10.2013 10:13, schrieb Ben Walton:
> Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
> semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
> of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
> see string2 padded to the length of string1 u
Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
see string2 padded to the length of string1 using the final character
in string2. POSIX explic
11 matches
Mail list logo