Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:04:54AM +0100, tbo...@web.de wrote: > From: Torsten Bögershausen > > Currently the length of data which is stored in memory is stored > in "unsigned long" at many places in the code base. > This is OK when both "unsigned long" and size_t are 32 bits, > (and is OK when b

[PATCH/RFC v2 1/1] Use size_t instead of 'unsigned long' for data in memory

From: Torsten Bögershausen Currently the length of data which is stored in memory is stored in "unsigned long" at many places in the code base. This is OK when both "unsigned long" and size_t are 32 bits, (and is OK when both are 64 bits). On a 64 bit Windows system am "unsigned long" is 32 bit,