Hi Karsten,
On 2015-09-29 12:23, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Am 28.09.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
>> Otherwise there would be that little loop-hole where (nsec % 1000) == 0 *by
>> chance* and we assume the timestamps to be identical even if they are not.
>
> Yeah, but in this case the
Am 28.09.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Otherwise there would be that little loop-hole where (nsec % 1000) == 0 *by
> chance* and we assume the timestamps to be identical even if they are not.
Yeah, but in this case the file would be racy, as racy-checks use
the same comparison now.
Hi Karsten,
On 2015-09-28 12:39, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Different git variants record file times in the index with different
> precisions, according to their capabilities. E.g. git compiled with NO_NSEC
> records seconds only, JGit records the mtime in milliseconds, but leaves
> ctime blank (becau
Different git variants record file times in the index with different
precisions, according to their capabilities. E.g. git compiled with NO_NSEC
records seconds only, JGit records the mtime in milliseconds, but leaves
ctime blank (because ctime is unavailable in Java).
This causes performance issu
4 matches
Mail list logo
