On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> We ask to accomplish a microproject before evaluating the proposals for
> one reason: to have a good understanding how well the students would
> interact with the project if they were accepted. As such, the
> microprojects really are abo
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream) wrote:
> Question: do you suggest any pending bugfix to git-add--interactive or
> to something related that might give some useful knowledge in advance?
> (for the pre-code period). My microproject involves playing with the
> dir_itera
checking is not implemented for shell scripts:
Since currently kcov is not implemented, checking the coverage of the shell
scripts is still an issue. It was also proposed in previous GSoC proposals, but
wasn’t implemented. I also checked out its implementation for linux kernel
project , but i
Well, Google requires me to have a draft on a Google Doc anyway for
the proposal, and I am unsure who exactly it will reach. Since it *is*
part of the discussion regarding my proposal, I suppose it is worth
posting here for anyone to comment:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dvF2PNRQvvZ351jCdKzO
Hi Stefan & Johannes,
Thank you for the precious feedback on the proposal. I don't see much
sense in sending a full "v2" of it and have you read it all over
again, so I'll just answer to your comments directly.
Also, although the GSoC website allows me to send a "proposal draft"
to you through th
Hi Stefan & Daniel,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream)
> wrote:
>
> > SYNOPSIS
> > There are many advantages to converting parts of git that are still
> > scripts to C builtins, among which execution speed, improved
> > com
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream)
wrote:
> SYNOPSIS
> There are many advantages to converting parts of git that are still
> scripts to C builtins, among which execution speed, improved
> compatibility and code deduplication.
agreed.
> git-add--interactive, one of th
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:52:42AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Devin Lehmacher wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am a student studying Computer Science at Cornell University. I
> > already completed a microproject, Move ~/.git-credential-cache/sock
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Devin Lehmacher wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am a student studying Computer Science at Cornell University. I
> already completed a microproject, Move ~/.git-credential-cache/socket to
> $XDG_CACHE_HOME/credential/socket a week and a half ago or so.
Nice. I
Hello everyone,
I am a student studying Computer Science at Cornell University. I
already completed a microproject, Move ~/.git-credential-cache/socket to
$XDG_CACHE_HOME/credential/socket a week and a half ago or so.
I am interested in 2 different projects and would like some advice on
them, to
Hi there. First of all, I'd like to thank all of the support up to now
with my microproject :). Here's a first draft of my proposal for
Google Summer of Code '17, based on the "Convert scripts to builtins"
idea. Please let me know what you think.
---
SYNOPSIS
There are many advantages to converti
I had updated the proposal before deadline, if someone is interesting.
2016-03-25 15:12 GMT+08:00 惠轶群 :
> Well, I should have done some search before ask.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Well, I should have done some search before ask.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Some developers are already working on that[1].
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/288306
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, 惠轶群 wrote:
> There is an interesting idea as an idea for GSoC of 2008, is it still
> proposable?
>
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/SoC2008I
There is an interesting idea as an idea for GSoC of 2008, is it still
proposable?
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/SoC2008Ideas#Restartable_Clone
2016-03-25 11:45 GMT+08:00 惠轶群 :
> Hi,
>
> I'm proposing to take part in GSoC as a developer of git.
>
> Here is my
> [Draft](https://docs.google
Hi,
I'm proposing to take part in GSoC as a developer of git.
Here is my
[Draft](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zqOVb_cnYcaix48ep1KNPeLpRHvNKA26kNXc78yjhMg/edit?usp=sharing).
I'm planning to refactor some part of git. Following is what I'm interested in:
- port parts of “git rebase” to a
Greetings,
I hope it is not yet too late to jump on the Summer of Code bandwagon.
I would appreciate comments on my application [1] and my microproject
contribution, which will follow this mail as a reply.
My proposal mostly stems from what was noted under "convert scripts to
builtins" and "git
As I was strongly encouraged to submit my GSoC proposal, I'll post it
here and CC to my possible mentor.
Please, provide with your feedback about my draft. You can also comment
it right in the Google doc. Thanks in advance
Proposal:
https://docs.google.com/docum
Updated examples with better description for force push and reset HEAD, as
suggested by Lars [11].
Thanks and regards,
Sidhant Sharma
[11]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/289365/focus=289495
---
Implement a beginner mode for Git.
Abstract
Git is a very powerful version
On Tuesday 22 March 2016 02:08 PM, Lars Schneider wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2016, at 11:19, Sidhant Sharma wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I updated the draft with links, ggit usage examples and some changes to the
>> timeline. I placed the links with reference here, but in the Google Doc,
>> they're
>> inline.
>>
On 21 Mar 2016, at 11:19, Sidhant Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> I updated the draft with links, ggit usage examples and some changes to the
> timeline. I placed the links with reference here, but in the Google Doc,
> they're
> inline.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sidhant Sharma
>
> ---
>
> Implement a
Hi,
I updated the draft with links, ggit usage examples and some changes to the
timeline. I placed the links with reference here, but in the Google Doc, they're
inline.
Thanks and regards,
Sidhant Sharma
---
Implement a beginner mode for Git.
Abstract
Git is a very powerful version control sys
On Monday 21 March 2016 01:59 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Sidhant Sharma writes:
>
>> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:22 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>>
>>> Note that it implies writting an almost full-blown option parser to
>>> recognize commands like
>>>
>>> ggit --work-tree git --namespace reset --git-di
Sidhant Sharma writes:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:22 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
>> Note that it implies writting an almost full-blown option parser to
>> recognize commands like
>>
>> ggit --work-tree git --namespace reset --git-dir --hard git log
>>
>> (just looking for "git", "reset" and "--ha
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:22 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Sidhant Sharma writes:
>
>> A wrapper is to be implemented around (currently called 'ggit'), which will
>> provide the following user interface:
>> `ggit `
> There's actually already a tool doing this:
>
> https://people.gnome.org/~newren
Sidhant Sharma writes:
> Implement a beginner mode for Git.
>
> Abstract
>
> Git is a very powerful version control system, with an array of features
> that lend the user with great capabilities. But it often so happens that some
> beginners are overwhelmed by its complexity and are unable to f
Hi,
I have drafted my proposal for the project 'Git Beginner', and would
like to request your suggestions on improving it. I'm also reading up the Git
documentation and the Git ProBook (again) to make notes for the beginner
documentation. Would be great to hear your comments on it.
Thanks and re
On 03/26/2015 10:07 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0530, karthik nayak wrote:
> All three commands select a subset of the repository’s refs and print the
> result. There has been an attempt to unify these commands by Jeff King[3]. I
> plan on continuing his work[4] and
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0530, karthik nayak wrote:
> All three commands select a subset of the repository’s refs and print the
> result. There has been an attempt to unify these commands by Jeff King[3]. I
> plan on continuing his work[4] and using his approach to tackle this
> project
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Paul Tan writes:
>
>> I think it's still good to have the ideal in mind though (and whoops I
>> forgot to put in the word "ideal" in the text).
>
> Using or not using fork is merely one of the trade-offs we can make.
>
> "If all other thing
On 24.03.2015 17:37, Paul Tan wrote:
I'm applying for git in the Google Summer of Code this year. For my
project, I propose to rewrite git-pull.sh and git-am.sh into fast
optimized C builtins. I've already hacked up a prototype of a builtin
git-pull in [1], and it showed a promising 8x improveme
Paul Tan writes:
> I think it's still good to have the ideal in mind though (and whoops I
> forgot to put in the word "ideal" in the text).
Using or not using fork is merely one of the trade-offs we can make.
"If all other things are equal, no fork is better than a fork" is a
meaningless statem
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Paul Tan writes:
>
>> ..., I propose the following requirements for the rewritten code:
>>
>> 1. No spawning of external git processes. This is to support systems with
>> high
>>``fork()`` or process creation overhead, and to redu
Paul Tan writes:
> ..., I propose the following requirements for the rewritten code:
>
> 1. No spawning of external git processes. This is to support systems with high
>``fork()`` or process creation overhead, and to reduce redundant IO by
>taking advantage of the internal object, index a
Paul Tan writes:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Matthieu Moy
> wrote:
>
>> About the timeline: I'd avoid too much parallelism. Usually, it's best
>> to try to send a first patch to the mailing list as soon as possible,
>> hence focus on one point first (I'd do that with pull, since that's th
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Matthieu Moy
wrote:
> A few minor details:
>
> "on operating systems with poor file system performance (i.e. Windows)"
> => that's not only windows, I also commonly use a slow filesystem on
> Linux, just because it's NFS. Mentionning other cases of poor filesystem
Hi all,
I'm applying for git in the Google Summer of Code this year. For my
project, I propose to rewrite git-pull.sh and git-am.sh into fast
optimized C builtins. I've already hacked up a prototype of a builtin
git-pull in [1], and it showed a promising 8x improvement in execution
time on Windows
Hi all,
I have attempted a microproject [1][2] and this is my first draft of
the proposal.I have included only the matter regarding my approach
to solving the problem and shall add my personal details later.
Please be kind enough to go through my proposal and suggest modifications
or detailing wh
nything more I might have missed out on, in the proposal.
GSOC Proposal : Unifying git branch -l, git tag -l, and git for-each-ref
# Main objectives of the projec
karthik nayak writes:
> if there is any way
> where i could contribute to git via bug fixes or something similar
Yes, it is called the Git mailing list, and you are posting to
one. ;-)
This project works primarily with "scratch your itch" principle.
When you see bugs or room for improvement in
Hello,
Now that i have already submitted my proposal to GSOC , i was
wondering if there is any way
where i could contribute to git via bug fixes or something similar to
the microprojects which
was available prior to GSOC application.
Also wondering if any clarification was needed as per my proposal
f something I use on a regular basis
and would be able to contribute to the project even after GSOC.
Proposal
Ideas Page : Git configuration API improvements
The Following improvements have to be made to how configs are handled in git :
Read all the config files once and store them in an appropri
Hi,
Sorry for this late reply, I was busy for past few days.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:19:23PM +0800, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
>
>> I'm Yuxuan Shui, a undergraduate student from China. I'm applying for
>> GSoC 2014, and here is my proposal:
>>
>> I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:19:23PM +0800, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
> I'm Yuxuan Shui, a undergraduate student from China. I'm applying for
> GSoC 2014, and here is my proposal:
>
> I found this idea on the ideas page, and did some research about it.
> The pack bitmap patchset add a new .bitmap file for
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Yuxuan Shui, a undergraduate student from China. I'm applying for
> GSoC 2014, and here is my proposal:
>
> I found this idea on the ideas page, and did some research about it.
> The pack bitmap patchset add a new .bitmap file
Hi,
I'm Yuxuan Shui, a undergraduate student from China. I'm applying for
GSoC 2014, and here is my proposal:
I found this idea on the ideas page, and did some research about it.
The pack bitmap patchset add a new .bitmap file for every pack file
which contains the reachability information of sel
46 matches
Mail list logo
