On 06/16, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> Yet another iteration of my patch. We have changed the series a little bit. We
> now have a commit that rename `reset_for_rollback` to `reset_merge`. A lot of
> nit-picks were handled in this revision.
Thanks for your work! I allowed myself to nitpick a bit more a
Yet another iteration of my patch. We have changed the series a little bit. We
now have a commit that rename `reset_for_rollback` to `reset_merge`. A lot of
nit-picks were handled in this revision.
Thanks
Rohit
Rohit Ashiwal (4):
sequencer: add advice for revert
sequencer: rename reset_for_ro
On 06/09, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> > > PR: https://github.com/r1walz/git/pull/1
> > > Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gummerer
> >
> > Note that the 'Reviewed-by' footer is something that is "given" by the
> > reviewers, and should only be added after they have explicitly given
Hey Thomas
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 2:32 PM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> Thanks! I found a few minor nits that I missed in my off-list review
> on the PR. We should give others some time to comment now before you
> re-send it with the nits fixed (if you agree with them).
Yes, I'll wait for some mo
On 06/09, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> git am or rebase advice user to use git am --skip or git rebase --skip
> to skip the commit that has become empty or has risen conflicts. OTOH,
> cherry-pick advice user to use git reset HEAD which on the user’s part
> is annoying and sometimes confusing. This patch
git am or rebase advice user to use git am --skip or git rebase --skip
to skip the commit that has become empty or has risen conflicts. OTOH,
cherry-pick advice user to use git reset HEAD which on the user’s part
is annoying and sometimes confusing. This patch series will bring
consistency between
6 matches
Mail list logo
