"Kyle J. McKay" writes:
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote:
>
>> In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
>> tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently
>> caused
>> me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
>
On Feb 4, 2015, at 22:11, Scott Schmit wrote:
In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently
caused
me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
single commit, and it was very diffic
In my use of git, I've noticed that "git status" is a lot better at
tracking moves and renames than "git diff", and this has recently caused
me a lot of headaches because a large number of moves were made in a
single commit, and it was very difficult to figure out which moves were
right and which w
3 matches
Mail list logo
