Dear Git users,
It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.9.3(2) is available from:
https://git-for-windows.github.io/
Changes since Git for Windows v2.9.3 (August 13th 2016)
New Features
• Comes with Git Credential Manager v1.6.1.
• The feature introduced with Git for W
Hi Torsten,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> > I was not talking about the cost of correcting mistakes. Running --filters
> > is potentially very costly. Just so you understand what I am talking
> > about: I have a report that says that checking out a sizeable worktree
> > with
I was not talking about the cost of correcting mistakes. Running --filters
is potentially very costly. Just so you understand what I am talking
about: I have a report that says that checking out a sizeable worktree
with core.autocrlf=true is 58% slower than with core.autocrlf=false. That
is horr
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> In any case, in the ideal future, I would imagine that we would want
> >> to have "cat-file blob" to enable "--filters" by default; that would
> >> make cat-file and hash-objects a pair of symmetric operat
Hi Dakota,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Dakota Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dakota Hawkins wrote:
> >
> >> I use GFW almost exclusively, but I pretty much always consult the
> >> upstream documentation anyway (because I find
From: "Dakota Hawkins"
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
Hi Dakota,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dakota Hawkins wrote:
I use GFW almost exclusively, but I pretty much always consult the
upstream documentation anyway (because I find it easier).
Oh... I thought that typin
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> In any case, in the ideal future, I would imagine that we would want
>> to have "cat-file blob" to enable "--filters" by default; that would
>> make cat-file and hash-objects a pair of symmetric operations.
>
> I would advocate against that. It is not like the terms
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Dakota,
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dakota Hawkins wrote:
>
>> I use GFW almost exclusively, but I pretty much always consult the
>> upstream documentation anyway (because I find it easier).
>
> Oh... I thought that typing "git help gi
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > The feature in question is also highly unlikely to be used as much by
> > non-Windows users as by Windows users due to the unfortunate choice of the
> > default setting for core.autocrlf.
>
> My vague reco
Hi Dakota,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dakota Hawkins wrote:
> I use GFW almost exclusively, but I pretty much always consult the
> upstream documentation anyway (because I find it easier).
Oh... I thought that typing "git help git-commit" opening a nice HTML page
in your favorite browser was good enou
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > In case it is not crystal-clear, let me clarify one very important point.
> > It seems that some people mistake the work I do for something I do on a
> > whim. This is not so.
> >
> > The patch series that
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> The feature in question is also highly unlikely to be used as much by
> non-Windows users as by Windows users due to the unfortunate choice of the
> default setting for core.autocrlf.
My vague recollection from some years ago was that even among those
who were activ
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > One way to avoid that risk may be to release the new feature as
> > "experimental-and-subject-to-change", so that interested users on
> > Windows can actually try it out to see if the feature itself
> > (whate
Junio C Hamano writes:
> One way to avoid that risk may be to release the new feature as
> "experimental-and-subject-to-change", so that interested users on
> Windows can actually try it out to see if the feature itself
> (whatever its interface to them is) makes sense, and you can gauge
> the va
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> In case it is not crystal-clear, let me clarify one very important point.
> It seems that some people mistake the work I do for something I do on a
> whim. This is not so.
>
> The patch series that triggered this entire unfortunate discussion
> introduced the --smudg
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> > Maybe you want to re-read what you wrote to trigger his response, and
> > consider adjusting your attitude ("I want this now so I'll release it in
> > Git4Win") rather than the downst
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Maybe you want to re-read what you wrote to trigger his response, and
> consider adjusting your attitude ("I want this now so I'll release it in
> Git4Win") rather than the downstream name.
I am working *very* hard on improving the user
Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 23.08.2016 15:54:
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Junio,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> An
Hi Duy,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > Hi Junio,
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Schindelin writes:
> >>
> >> >> And then your "git cat-file" patch can be upstreamed with the option
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>>
>> >> And then your "git cat-file" patch can be upstreamed with the option
>> >> renamed to (or with an additional synonym) "--filters", which
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> And then your "git cat-file" patch can be upstreamed with the option
> >> renamed to (or with an additional synonym) "--filters", which would make
> >> things consistent.
> >
> > Right. I would like to ask
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> And then your "git cat-file" patch can be upstreamed with the option
>> renamed to (or with an additional synonym) "--filters", which would make
>> things consistent.
>
> Right. I would like to ask for a `--smudge` synonym nevertheless, just
> because I already use
Hi Junio,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > New Features
> >
> > • Comes with Git 2.9.3.
>
> For future reference, what time (in UTC) of the day is convenient
> for you to see an upstream tarball?
Heh... I don't do tarballs anymore, I now use thi
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> New Features
>
> • Comes with Git 2.9.3.
For future reference, what time (in UTC) of the day is convenient
for you to see an upstream tarball?
> • Sports a new --smudge option for git cat-file that lets it pass
> blob contents through smudge filters configu
Dear Git users,
It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.9.3 is available from:
https://git-for-windows.github.io/
Changes since Git for Windows v2.9.2 (July 16th 2016)
New Features
??? Comes with Git 2.9.3.
??? Updated Git Credential Manager to version 1.6.0.
??? Inc
25 matches
Mail list logo
