On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:03:33PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > So this is really an internal failure at the ref-update stage. There
> > _should_ be a reasonable error message, but I think "fatal error in
> > commit_refs" is the generic last-ditch fallback. I'll pass this along to
> > people in ch
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:49:12AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> I got the message in the subject when pushing to github today. Yes I
>> know it's github, not git. But according to stackoveflow [1] it's a
>> local problem. Which makes me think, if
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:49:12AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I got the message in the subject when pushing to github today. Yes I
> know it's github, not git. But according to stackoveflow [1] it's a
> local problem. Which makes me think, if we know exactly what this is
> (or at least roughly the
I got the message in the subject when pushing to github today. Yes I
know it's github, not git. But according to stackoveflow [1] it's a
local problem. Which makes me think, if we know exactly what this is
(or at least roughly the problem area), maybe we could improve git to
catch it locally in the
4 matches
Mail list logo