Re: "True" git merge in git-pasky

2005-04-19 Thread Francois Romieu
Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Now you decided to do a little bit of parallel development and stick > your patches not ready for 2.6.12 to a separate tree. That's fine, do > > git fork experimental ~/linux-2.6.experimental > > and get some coffee. (It takes about 8 minutes here,

Re: "True" git merge in git-pasky

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:43:07AM CEST, I got a letter where bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:51:07AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git > > I pulled the tar.bz2 and did make: > gcc -g -O3 -Wall -o merge-cach

Re: "True" git merge in git-pasky

2005-04-18 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:51:07AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git I pulled the tar.bz2 and did make: gcc -g -O3 -Wall -o merge-cache merge-cache.o libgit.a libgit.a -lssl -lz gcc -g -O3 -Wall -c -o unpack-file.o unpack-file.c gcc -g -O3 -Wall -o unpack-file u

"True" git merge in git-pasky

2005-04-18 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, so I've implemented "true" git merge in git-pasky, using core git's merging capabilities. It seems to even work. :-) I tested it briefly, and even did one non-conflicting and one conflicting merge with Linus with this, but I'd like to hear your comments