Re: [PATCH 3/3] stash: require a clean index to apply

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Jeff King wrote: > I dunno. With respect to the original patch, I am OK if we just want to > revert it. This area of stash seems a bit under-designed IMHO, but if > people were happy enough with it before, I do not think the safety > benefit from ed178ef is that gr

Re: [PATCH 3/3] stash: require a clean index to apply

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jeff King wrote: > Hrm. The new protection in v2.4.2 is meant to prevent you from losing > your index state during step 4 when we run into a conflict. But here you > know something that git doesn't: that we just created the stash based on > this same state, so it sh

Fwd: [PATCH 3/3] stash: require a clean index to apply

Hi folks, I'm not sure how to respond to a particular mail [1] while keeping this new one in the same thread, being that I just subscribed to the list and I can't find a Message-ID in [1][2] either, so please forgive me. I bumped to 2.4.2 and I'm experiencing the very same issue Jonathan Kamens w