Heyup, Dr. Gruber.
On 7 April 2015 at 15:53, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I'm wondering what the difference is - or should be - between "git log"
> and "git rev-list" with (completely) user specified output. That
> question goes both ways:
>
> - Why do we need "rev-list" to have completely flexible
Hallo, Mr. Hamano.
Thank you for your quick and detailed response.
On 5 April 2015 at 23:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This is very much the designed behaviour, I would think. IIRC, the
> user-format support of "rev-list" was designed so that the scripts
> can customize the output from "rev-list
Heyup, everybody.
Apologies if this turns out to be a duplicate. Gmane seems broken, so
I couldn't search the archive.
I'm using git version 2.4.0-rc1. The same behavior exists in 2.1.0.
With git-log it is possible to specify a custom pretty format that
outputs one line per commit:
> git log --p
3 matches
Mail list logo
