AW: [PATCH 2/2] stash: use "stash--helper"

>>> Yes, I did. It definitly makes things easier if you are not used to mailing >>> lists, but it was also a bit of a kerfuffle. I tried to start working on >>> coverletter support, but I couldn't get it to accept the amazon SES >>> credentials I provided. I ended up manually submiting the cover

AW: [PATCH 1/2] stash--helper: implement "git stash--helper"

ng on a v2 that incorporates the feedback from you, Thomas Gummerer and Stefan Beller then. Further feedback is of course welcome. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 00:06 An: Matthias Asshauer Cc: git@vger.kernel.o

AW: [PATCH 2/2] stash: use "stash--helper"

> You had some good measurements in the coverletter, which is not going to be > recorded in the projects history. This part however would be part of the > commit. > So you could move the speed improvements here (as well as the other > reasoning) on why this is a good idea. :) I considered that,

[PATCH 0/2] Make stash a builtin

These are the first two Patches in an upcomming series of Patches to convert git stash into a builtin command. This is mainly based on the general performance of scripts running inside an interpreter (bash in this case) running inside a POSIX emulation layer on Windows. Shell, perl and python scrip