I hit an issue in Git today that seemed to be a bug. Basically what
happened is in our master branch we had two files, one named something
like "file_NAME.png" and another named "file_name.png" in the same
folder. In the develop branch in the same repo we had removed the
"file_NAME.png" file so t
Ryan Anderson wrote:
Git falls into the category of distributed source code management tools,
similar to Arch or Darcs (or, in the commercial world, BitKeeper). This
means that every working directory is a full-fledged repository with
full revision tracking capabilities.
That's not actually wh
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That said, I really think the dumb protocols are useless anyway. No other
system supports pure static object pulling anyway, and as far as I'm
concerned, I want "rsync" to kind of work (but it won't be optimal, since
re-pack
Chris Wright wrote:
> Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds.
(snip)
> Creates a package named git, which seems
> fine since Linus' isn't likely to be packaged directly.
Um. Really? I can't imagine why Linus's git wouldn't be packaged
directly. He has strongly indicated that folks who want
Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 22:05 -0400, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>>Notice that just by looking at my diffs, you can't tell that I used a
>>replace operation.
>
>
> Here's where we disagree. If you checkpoint your tree before the
> replace, and im
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Git is very immature, and currently should only be used by brave
>>pioneers. About the only way for a mortal to even try git is to stick
>>to git-pasky releases, and not try to track all the patc
Klaus Robert Suetterlin wrote:
> 1) There is no clear (e.g. by name) distinction between ``git as done
> by Linus'', which is a kind of content addressable database with added
> semantics, and ``git as done by the rest of You'', which is a kind of
> SCM on top of Linuses stuff.
I also see this as
I just stumbled across this page, dated 2003, which foreshadows a couple
of the decisions Linus has made for git:
http://ydirson.free.fr/en/software/scm/vc.txt
Here are the parts that particularly caught my eye:
"what's so special about files ?" where the author suggests that
existing SCM syst
Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 21:05 -0400, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>>>>The other is "replace very instace of identifier `foo` with
>>>>identifier`bar`".
>>>
>>>That could be derived, however, by a particularly smart parser [1].
>
Ray Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 21:04 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>The other is "replace very instace of identifier `foo` with identifier`bar`".
>
>
> That could be derived, however, by a particularly smart parser [1].
No, it can't. Seriously. A darcs replace patch is encoded as r
David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Does anyone know of any other issues in how git data is stored that
> might cause problems for some situations? Windows' case-insensitive/
> case-preserving model for NTFS and vfat32 seems to be enough
> (since the case is preserved) so that the format should work,
If gi
11 matches
Mail list logo
