> Makes sense. It's certainly not impossible to have some magic "push to
> git". I only wanted to point out that it's extra complexity, so if you
> could do away with that aspect of it you'd save yourself some
> complexity. I was going to elaborate a bit on how that can go wrong,
> but I see Jeff s
> As you noticed, this used to be allowed. But it's dangerous, because if
> the movement of the objects out of quarantine fails, then you're left
> with a corrupted ref (ditto, anybody looking at the ref after update but
> before quarantine ends will see what appears to be a corrupted
> repository)
> > Dear members of the Git community,
> >
> > The enterprise I work for is planning to switch from svn to git.
> >
> > Before the complete switch to git we have decided to implement a scenario
> > where the two SCMs live together, being the svn repository the reference.
> > We also want this scena
Dear members of the Git community,
The enterprise I work for is planning to switch from svn to git.
Before the complete switch to git we have decided to implement a scenario
where the two SCMs live together, being the svn repository the reference. We
also want this scenario to be transparent for
4 matches
Mail list logo