NEED YOUR ASSIST PLEASE

Hello My name Mrs. Ann Johnson from UK,I am a dying woman who had decided to donate what I have left to you. I am 59 years old and was diagnosed of ovarian cancer about 2 years ago immediately after the death of my husband, who had left me with everything he worked for. I have decided to

A donation of 800,000.00 USD has been made in your favor

A donation of 800,000.00 USD has been made in your favor, Kindly contact the donor Mr. Johnson via email (davidjson...@aol.com ) for more details on your donation funds.

[no subject]

-- OFFRE DE PRÊT !!! APPLIQUER MAINTENANT Faites une demande de prêt urgent aujourd'hui ... faites une demande de prêt privé, de prêt commercial et de prêt personnel avec un taux d'intérêt très bas, aussi bas que 2%, sur une période de remboursement de 1-25 ans, dans le monde entier. Nous accord

Feature-request: git-bundle --quiet

s a better incremental backup of large Git repos, later steps would be easier selection of ranges (writing out markers e.g. to use in the next day's incremental backup), and more fine-grained control of the bundle repack behavior (e.g. don't try hard to repack, backup speed is important) --

push.recurseSubmodules=check doesn't consider tags

I occasionally rebase my submodules. I realize the danger (historical submodule pointers could point to commits that get garbage-collected away) so I always create and push a tag before the rebase, to make sure the old commits will never get purged. I believe this is safe, based on some experime

Re: [PATCH] submodule foreach: fix " --quiet" not being respected

odule--helper embed-git-dir [...]"), > + N_("git submodule--helper asorb-git-dirs [] > [...]"), Nit typo here: s/asorb/absorb/ -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4

Re: regression AGAIN in output of git-pull --rebase --recurse-submodules=yes --quiet

snip patch, please add my DCO signed-off-by) Tested-by: Robin H. Johnson Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson > -- 8< -- > > I'm a bit reluctant to follow up with a proper patch because I can't > digest the t5572-submodule-pull.sh tests. And we definitely need to > add a

regression AGAIN in output of git-pull --rebase --recurse-submodules=yes --quiet

ect it was a result of: ea27893a65cc41cad2710466aa6a58866ff22f1e Merge branch 'pc/submodule-helper-foreach' But I haven't done a full bisect to prove it yet. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 05:57:29AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Somewhere between 2.13.6 & 2.14.1 there's a

Show-branch without commits

Is it possible (or could a flag be added) to have show-branch only show the branch hierarchy at the top and not print out the commit list? --Brian

Skipping history and save bandwidth: how can I jump between shallow clones, without sending unused blobs

t the remote does NOT send any blobs that are not reachable from the new tip (e.g. blobs that existed between the old state and the new state, but aren't needed anymore). -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4

Morning

Hello; kindly see the attached my proposal Charities donation. Mrs. Joy Smith Johnson.rtf Description: RTF file

I want you to Distribute my funds to less priviledge if interested reply now

I want you to Distribute my funds to less priviledge if interested reply now

hi

i'm diagnosed with laryngeal cancer, i want to leave money to you,am giving my body to science for research. i want this last act of mine to be an offering to GOD and humanity. respond so i know you got this.God bless you abundantly

unsub

unsubscribe git

Would a config var for --force-with-lease be useful?

want to submit a patch if this is a feature that isn't likely to be accepted, so I wanted to get some thoughts from the mailing list regarding this idea. Thank you, ~Scott Johnson

Hello

My name is Lisa i saw your email today when i was searching for someone i can trust and let know more about me and i became interested in you, i will also like to know you the more, I believe we can move from here! I am waiting for your mail. and I have vital information you need to know. Please,

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

us: How do you differentiate between -c behavior that should be one-time-only vs persisted by being written to $GIT_DIR/config during $GIR_DIR init? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

hat git updates) help? Yes, that, along with the target revision I think would allow most or all of the desired behaviors mentioned in this thread *. It also needs to fire in cases like 'git reset --hard $REV'. * For this case, I just need the mtimes to be consistent within a single

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

pproach can completely solve the problem. > > I appreciate Ævar's concern that there are more than just two mtime > requests floating around. But I think git's users are best served by a > built-in approach, with a config setting to control the desired mtime > handling (d

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:41:07AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Robin H. Johnson" writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:01:29PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > >> Currently git does not control mtimes of files being checked out. This > >> means that th

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

directories be set if the directory is explicitly created? - Maybe using futimens on supported platforms? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkout: Force matching mtime between files

art time and end time of this checkout. The relations between mtimes > of different files depend on the order in which they are checked out, > filesystem speed and timestamp precision. > ... Junio: ping for review or inclusion of this patch? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, I

Hello from Lisa

Hello dear, I am Miss Lisa. I have very important thing to discuss with you please, this information is very vital. Contact me with my private email so we can talk (lisajohnsonsalima...@hotmail.com ) Lisa.

lucky winner

Wow!!! Congratulation It is a great pleasure to inform you that you emerge winner to the sum of 1,850,000.00 Euro For more inquiries contact: Mr Johnson Paul trough his Email address:johnsonop...@gmail.com Yours faithfully, Online Coordinator's

regression in output of git-pull --rebase --recurse-submodules=yes --quiet

t. If you drop the --rebase, then you need to re-run step 3 first. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: should any build system legitimately change any tracked files?

hat are the possible mistakes here? - The intermediate source possibly should not be committed [depending on the tool, this isn't always an option] - The build system scripts (makefile etc) contains a mistake. - Some final (non-intermediate/non-source) file was committed. I've seen similar patt

hello..

>From The Regional Manager!, best regards!, How are you doing including your family, hope all is well? My purpose of contacting you is to crave your indulgence to assist me in securing some funds abroad. (US$7,500,000.00 ) I am writing you this proposal in good faith, believing that I can tru

Re: Bug Report: .gitignore behavior is not matching in git clean and git status

-all here, but will a reply automatically include the rest of the list? Or was reply-all the right move? On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Chris Johnson writes: > >> I am a mailing list noob so I’m sorry if this is the wrong format or >> the wrong please

Bug Report: .gitignore behavior is not matching in git clean and git status

I am a mailing list noob so I’m sorry if this is the wrong format or the wrong please. Here’s the setup for the bug (I will call it a bug but I half expect somebody to tell me I’m an idiot): git init echo "/A/B/" > .gitignore git add .gitignore && git commit -m 'Add ignore' mkdir -p A/B touch A/B

git-clone --config order & fetching extra refs during initial clone

tes/origin/changes/* \ $REPOURI $DIR \ && cd $DIR \ && git fetch -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE0

link broken on git man page

This link below is broken in the man page. (I'm on Debian Jessie). GIT(1)Git Manual GIT(1) NAME git - the stupid content tracker SYNOPSIS git [--version] [--help] [-C ] [-c =] [--exec-path[=]] [--html-path] [--m

Why are there multiple ways to get the manual in Git?

. Respectfully, Andrew Johnson

Re: git branch doesn't allow me to forcibly delete branch which was checked out in a now-deleted worktree dir

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:58:26PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Erik Johnson wrote: On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:41:17PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: It is possible we should update "git branch -d" should perform a worktree prune first, since that would en

Re: git branch doesn't allow me to forcibly delete branch which was checked out in a now-deleted worktree dir

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:41:17PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Erik Johnson wrote: I'm not expecting _any_ git branch command to prune worktrees, but a branch _deletion_ shouldn't fail because git thinks the branch is checked out in a worktree that doe

Re: git branch doesn't allow me to forcibly delete branch which was checked out in a now-deleted worktree dir

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:39:26PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Erik Johnson wrote: % git branch -D archive-extracted-xz error: Cannot delete branch 'archive-extracted-xz' checked out at '/home/erik/git/salt/archive-extracted-xz' % test -d

git branch doesn't allow me to forcibly delete branch which was checked out in a now-deleted worktree dir

% git branch -D archive-extracted-xz error: Cannot delete branch 'archive-extracted-xz' checked out at '/home/erik/git/salt/archive-extracted-xz' % test -d /home/erik/git/salt/archive-extracted-xz || echo "directory doesn't exist" directory doesn't exist % git --version git version 2.9.0 I know

Re: [PATCH 1/2] archive-tar: write extended headers for file sizes >= 8GB

--no-name >barerepo.tar.gz.gz -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 -- To unsubscribe from this lis

Re: git-secret - store your private data inside a repository

r access groups later. It's also that it aims to be a simple secret storage tool (no random blobs), with an optional Git backing (simply making the directory versioned), rather than secret-storage-for-any-git-repo. I included pass also because it has some nice UX (IMO). -- Robin Hugh J

Re: git-secret - store your private data inside a repository

7;s at least as old as the Git history indicates, possibly older, I don't know if the Git history included a full conversion of SVN history. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP :

Re: [RFC] GPG-Signed pushes & commits: differentiating between no signature and an unknown key

the validation > status, that certainly sounds like a bug, as that would make "more > advanced use" above impossible. But I am not sure how that happens. I think the earlier blobs got GC'd, hence why I didn't find them. Advanced usage: Maybe record them to a ref of fail

[RFC] GPG-Signed pushes & commits: differentiating between no signature and an unknown key

27;, then none of the GIT_PUSH_CERT* env vars are set. In the case of the signed push with the unknown key, they should remain set. [1] Eg, if you have an externally curated keyring and use trust-model always. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Tru

Military Man from Syria

Hello How are you today, I'm Mr Johnson Martin from United State of America, I'm 46 years now, also Military man. I'm working here in Syria, please i want to know more about you and how reliable that i can trust you,, if your aren't Interested please never mind to reply, i

doc-0g-7g-docs.googleusercontent.com

Sent from my IPhone -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

"Medium" log format: change proposal for author != committer

& git-show output. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.k

Re: Build error with current source release

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > Hi > > I hope it is okay to ask such a question here. > > I cloned the current source tree and tried to build it and I get the > following error. > Could someone tell me why and if there is an easy way to fix it? > I’m running on a Mac

Re: Is there way to set git commit --date to be older than 1970 ?

is prepared to > pass such a timestamp as a sane value---instead they diagnose a > failure and die. I remember a pretty old thread found some success storing timestamps this way: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/152433 -Dan Johnson -- To unsubscribe from this list: sen

Re: Feature Proposal: Track all branches from a given remote

Hi Brian: > [remote "origin"] > fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/heads/* Yes, you're right, this works just fine as long as I move out from a branch that's not in the remote in question, for example by doing: git checkout -b nothing git fetch - OR - git pull Do you think there would be any interes

Feature Proposal: Track all branches from a given remote

ack from that remote previous to this invocation of the command. If I were to start work on a patch, would there be any interest in this feature, or are there reasons why it isn't currently implemented? Thank you, ~Scott Johnson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe gi

Re: Can I fetch an arbitrary commit by sha1?

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Christian Halstrick wrote: > I always though during fetch I have to specify a refspec and that a > sha1 would not be accepted as a ref. Firing some like 'git fetch > origin ' should be forbidden. But in fact I see that such a > fetch command succeeds if you already

HELP-DESK!!

520MB 520MB Quota mail size 97.9% Your password will expires TODAY CLICK-HERE-TO-ACTIVATE your email account for 2014: to validate your E-mail. Thanks System Administrator MAILBOX PORTAL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in th

Von Dr. Michael Johnson

Lieber Freund, Wie geht es dir heute? Ich hoffe, fein, ich bin Dr. Michael Johnson von Harlesden, North West London, hier in England. Ich arbeite für NatWest Bank London (National Westminster Bank Plc.). Ich schreibe Ihnen aus meinem Büro, die von einer großen immensen Nutzen für beide von

Re: Git server memory requirements

So far it's best mitigated by the pack-bitmap patches in the next branch. The initial clones become significantly faster and much less resource intensive. I'm hoping that the packed bitmap series lands soon in the master branch and a formal release (a big +1 from me for it). -- Robin

Re: [PATCH] clone: allow initial sparse checkouts

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:47:16AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Robin H. Johnson" writes: > > The only other clean alternative would be implementing ONLY > > --sparse-checkout-from, and letting uses use fds creatively: > > --sparse-checkout-from <(echo X; e

Re: [PATCH] clone: allow initial sparse checkouts

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 03:43:47PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >> > This patch implements easily accessible sparse checkouts during clone, > >> > in the --sparse-checkout option. > >> > > &g

Re: [PATCH] clone: allow initial sparse checkouts

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:52:16AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Presently if you want to perform a sparse checkout, you must either do a > > full clone and then recheckout, or do a git init, manually set up > > spars

[PATCH] clone: allow initial sparse checkouts

--sparse-checkout PATH Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson --- Documentation/git-clone.txt | 5 + builtin/clone.c | 24 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt index 0363d00..1c21207 100644

Re: Make the git codebase thread-safe

on and found it lacking), with very deep history (but no branches of note, and very few tags). -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Re: [PATCH v2] userdiff: update Ada patterns

On 04/02/14 06:30, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Adrian Johnson writes: > >> - Allow extra space in "is new" and "is separate" >> - Fix bug in word regex for numbers >> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson >> --- >> t/t4034/ada/expect

[PATCH v2] userdiff: update Ada patterns

- Allow extra space in "is new" and "is separate" - Fix bug in word regex for numbers Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson --- t/t4034/ada/expect | 2 +- userdiff.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t4034/ada/expect b/t/t4034/ada/

Re: [PATCH] userdiff: update Ada patterns

On 03/02/14 10:05, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:21:56PM +1030, Adrian Johnson wrote: >> - Fix bug in word regex for numbers >> - "|[0-9][-+0-9#_.eE]" >> + "|[-+0-9#_.eE]+" > > This makes "E" or "_" a

[PATCH] userdiff: update Ada patterns

- Allow extra space in "is new" and "is separate" - Fix bug in word regex for numbers Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson --- t/t4034/ada/expect | 2 +- userdiff.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t4034/ada/expect b/t/t4034/ada/

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CommunityGuidelines

sh to use "she" when the > gender is not known. Could you please use "themself" instead? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 -- To unsubscribe fr

Bug in Submodule add

are of all of these steps is in order anyways. Not sure you want to encourage people poking around in the .git directory. If this is already resolved in the newest versions, please disregard Thanks! Jonathan Johnson http://jondavidjohn.com | m...@jondavidjohn.com -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH 2/3] add basic lua infrastructure

quot; on Gentoo. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord.

[PATCHv2] Add userdiff patterns for Ada

Add Ada xfuncname and wordRegex patterns to the list of builtin patterns. Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson --- On 17/09/12 14:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: > You could add test vectors to check if the built-in xfuncname > catches beginning of functions in Ada correctly if you wanted to, > bu

Re: [PATCH] Add userdiff patterns for Ada

On 16/09/12 15:37, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Adrian Johnson writes: > >> Add Ada xfuncname and wordRegex patterns to the list of builtin >> patterns. >> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson >> --- > > Interesting. I do not read Ada, but in this "

[PATCH] Add userdiff patterns for Ada

Add Ada xfuncname and wordRegex patterns to the list of builtin patterns. Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson --- Documentation/gitattributes.txt | 2 ++ t/t4018-diff-funcname.sh| 2 +- t/t4034-diff-words.sh | 1 + t/t4034/ada/expect | 27

Re: [PATCH] git-am: Handle "git show" output correctly

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Dan Johnson writes: > >>> Not really. If we start encouraging people to use "git show" output >>> as a kosher input to "am", we would have to support such use >>> forever, and we end up

Re: [PATCH] git-am: Handle "git show" output correctly

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Peter Jones writes: > >> Well, if that happens, maybe we could regexp match on >> "[[:alnum:]_-]+: /someexprthatlookslikeanemailaddress/" ? > > I doubt that would be even reliably done. > >> But we could >> also just wait to cross that brid

Re: Suggestions for "What's cooking"

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote: > Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like >> you did here. >> >> And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way >> for me to publish "What's cooking

[PATCHv2] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote

Johnson --- On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Jeff King wrote: >Hmm. We allocate argv in fetch_multiple like this: > > const char *argv[12] = { "fetch", "--append" }; > >and then add a bunch of options to it, along with the name of the >remote. By my coun

[PATCH] fetch --all: pass --tags/--no-tags through to each remote

Reported-by: Oswald Buddenhagen Signed-off-by: Dan Johnson --- Junio C Hamano writes: >Dan Johnson writes: > >> I believe that is bad interaction with "--all" (probably a bug). If I >> am remembering correctly, --no-tags is internally a per-remote >> setting

Re: GC of alternate object store

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:03:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Oswald Buddenhagen writes: >> >> >> Doesn't >> >> >> >>git push $over_there 'refs/*:refs/remotes/mine/*' >> >> >> >> push your tag v1.0 to refs/remotes/mine/v1.0 ov

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] teach log --no-walk=unsorted, which avoids sorting

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > When 'git log' is passed the --no-walk option, no revision walk takes > place, naturally. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, however, the provided > revisions still get sorted by commit date. So e.g 'git log --no-walk > HEAD HEAD~1' and '

Re: exporting a .git file ?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyway to get my git repository as a single file ? You're probably looking for the git bundle command (see git bundle --help), but it's possible you might just want to use tar. Hope that helps, -- -Dan -- To unsubscribe from

Re: Fix git-svn for SVN 1.7

ok it over this weekend. > > Likewise. I'd prefer to see it cook during the feature freeze and > not merge to 'master' until post 1.7.12 cycle opens. I'm going to spin it and include in Gentoo's 1.7.12 packages, as we're in need of this explicitly, and this is why we funde

Re: False positive from orphaned_commit_warning() ?

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Has anyone else noticed false positives coming from the > orphan check? It is warning me about commits that are > clearly on master. Here is an example, where I checkout > master~2 and then switch back to master. It somehow thinks > that

Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-remote-mediawiki: allow page names with a ':'

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Traditionnally, pages named Foo:Bar are page 'Bar' in namespace 'Foo'. > However, it is also possible to call a page Foo:Bar if 'Foo' is not a > namespace. In this case, the actual name of the page is 'Foo:Bar', in the > main namespace. Since

Re: Feature request: fetch --prune by default

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Alexey Muranov wrote: > On 19 Jul 2012, at 13:55, Jeff King wrote: > >> I agree it would be much less confusing. However, one downside is that >> we do not keep reflogs on deleted branches (and nor did the commits in >> remote branches necessarily make it into the

Re: Feature request: fetch --prune by default

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:30:59AM +0200, Alexey Muranov wrote: > >> i would like >> >> `git fetch --prune ` >> >> to be the default behavior of >> >> `git fetch ` >> >> In fact, i think this is the only reasonable behavior. >> Keeping copies of