On 01/20/2013 01:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy writes:
>
>> Implementing "git rm -u" as a tree-wide command would create a
>> discrepancy with "git add -u". Implementing it as a "current
>> directory" command would make the migration harder if we eventually
>> try to change "git add
On 01/19/2013 04:49 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Eric James Michael Ritz wrote:
>
>> When I came to my senses and realized that does not work I began to
>> wonder if `git rm -u` should exist. If any deleted, tracked files
>> are not part of the index to commit then `g
On 01/19/2013 04:49 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> I think `git add -u` would be closer. It would stage removal of
> files, but would not stage untracked files. It would stage other
> type of changes though.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Tomas Carnecky
> Does `git add -A` do what you want?
Th
Hello everyone,
I am thinking about implementing a feature but I would appreciate any
feedback before I begin, because more experienced Git developers and
users may see some major problem that I do not.
Earlier today I deleted a file from a repository. I deleted it
normally, not by using `git r
4 matches
Mail list logo
