d9ac9df41c8c1c3a2f5b0fb1bcc0546dc1bafba2)
tree 636f8c808fd80fb886c5c8b96e854d7d9dea8591
parent d9ac9df41c8c1c3a2f5b0fb1bcc0546dc1bafba2
author Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1124215389 -0700
committer Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1124215389 -0700
Make tools use DESTDIR as well (otherwise rpm bui
* Wolfgang Denk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My problem is that I cannot satisfy the dependencies in a way which
> gets visible to RPM. And this is where I feel this is a bug in Fedora
> Core. But probably I'm just too dumb.
No, it's just lack of good support. Try rpm.pbone.net, they are there.
rs to create a tag message by passing message on command line
instead of requiring an $EDITOR session.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/git-tag-script b/git-tag-script
--- a/git-tag-script
+++ b/git-tag-script
@@ -4,13 +4,14 @@
. git-sh-setup-script || die &quo
* Sam Ravnborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Not knowing perl at all I wonder if some more widespread used packages
> can replace the above two?
> I recall having trouble locating them myself when I first tried Greg's
> send-a-lot-of-mails script.
I'm not too sure, but I too abandoned (well, rewrot
* Wolfgang Denk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It's then the "perl(Email::Valid)" and "perl(Mail::Sendmail)" depen-
> dencies which cause problems. I installed all perl packages and
> modules I was able to find in the standard FC places, but this did
> not solve the problem. Maybe this is a
nd line
instead of requiring an $EDITOR session.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/git-tag-script b/git-tag-script
--- a/git-tag-script
+++ b/git-tag-script
@@ -4,13 +4,14 @@
. git-sh-setup-script || die "Not a git archive"
usage () {
-echo >&a
* Junio C Hamano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ... Also, rpm is able to determine the perl dependencies
> > automatically (of course, ditto for shared libraries).
>
> I take it to mean that we do not have to
* Junio C Hamano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For RPM, from my lack of RPM expertise (and RPM capable
> environment until recently), I have not updated the "Prereq:"
> field in git-core.spec.in at all. I would appreciate somebody
> to sanity check the list of dependencies. The dependency list
> D
* Jay Denebeim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Um, guys...
>
> If you want to have a dependency on git-core >= 0.99.3 you need to
> actually like, you know, put it on-line as well. Just did a yum update,
> fails with:
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
> git-core >= 0.99.3 is needed by cogit
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Cogito is now alone!
> GIT is no longer part of Cogito distribution.
> That means you need to get and install it separately.
> It is recommended to use at least 0.99.3. The newer
> the better
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> where Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > This is leftover from early naming, and is no longer relevant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks, applied. BTW, Jo
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > The name of the tarball needs to be updated as well.
>
> Yes, I noticed.
>
> I ended up renaming the spec-file too.
>
> Pushed out,
Yup, looks good.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> here is Cogito 0.12.1, another desperate attempt to keep pace with
> '@' or Linus, the named Human Master Coder. (Linus, the Human Master
> Coder, mumbles arcane do { formulae } while (0)! Some kind of force
> seems to attack your mind. Everything sudd
This is leftover from early naming, and is no longer relevant.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/cogito.spec.in b/cogito.spec.in
--- a/cogito.spec.in
+++ b/cogito.spec.in
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ License:GPL
Group: Development/Tool
an,
> > but that is not a huge problem.
>
> Ok, why is debian problematic? Is there some missing dependency or
> something? I really haven't ever done an rpm, and the git rpm target was
> all done by Chris Wright, so I don't have any clue at all. Again, patches
>
* Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I tagged a "v0.99" thing, and pushed it out. I've also made trial
> > RPM's of it: src, ppc64 and x86. They're build on whatever random machines
> > I had, and on the ppc64 I chose to do it on m
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ok, cg-pull didn't quite handle this. I've fixed it so that it should
> reasonably handle it now. Hopefully.
Is this plus the zero-sized fix worth making cogito-0.12-2 rpm release?
IOW, these two patches...
diff-tree 291ec0f2d2ce65e5ccb876b46d6468af49dd
* Pavel Roskin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I suggest renaming t6000-lib.sh to t6000.lib.sh but I'll be happy with
> any other name that doesn't match t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh
It's already been renamed to t6000lib.sh in current git repo.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Linus,
You'll find the necessary infrastructure for doing an rpm build here:
kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chrisw/git.git
The diff is below:
diff-tree a9db297485a7b8c641d3cf686d03cb63b774e530 (from
dd7ba8b4949535c24e604a37709db0e3be9ccbbc)
Author: Chris Wright <[EMAIL P
Update cogito.spec.in to current. This uses .gz instead of .bz2 for source
target as suggested by John Ellson, as well as some assorted minor changes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/cogito.spec.in b/cogito.spec.in
--- a/cogito.spec.in
+++ b/cogito.s
* John Ellson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So now I have to ask, where does that come from if its not created by
> "make dist" ?
It's automated by kernel.org mirroring (along with signature
generation). So .gz is built, uploaded, the rest is automatic.
> Is what I'm asking to do in the above se
* John Ellson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> But:
>cd cogito
>cg-update
>make dist
>rpmbuild -ta cogito-0.12.tar.gz
>
> still doesn't work.Do you have a different process for generating
> the initial cogito-0.12-1src.rpm ?
I start from the bz2 from kernel.org.
thanks,
-chris
-
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the release of the 0.12 version of the Cogito
> SCM-like layer over Linus' GIT tree history storage tool. Get it at
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/cogito/
RPMs uploading to:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/soft
* John Ellson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "rpmbuild -ta cogito-0.12.tar.gz" fails because cogito.spec.in refers to
> ".bz2" in its "Source:" line, instead of to ".gz".
Just grab the .bz2, or the SRPM http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/cogito/RPMS
(still mirroring, I just uploaded it a bit ago)
>
* Petr Baudis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:55:21AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > Here's a simple spec file to do rpm builds. It's against the
> > latest Makefile (whi
e
Version, so it's set against 0.6.3 (expecting it to be forthcoming
shortly). It installs to /usr/local/bin, and expects the tarball to be
named git-pasky-0.6.3.tar.bz2. Creates a package named git, which seems
fine since Linus' isn't likely to be packaged directly. Enjoy.
26 matches
Mail list logo
