2018 at 03:01:10PM -0400, Andrew Wolfe wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> Not completely sure what you're saying. If the files on master are
>> not changed, the changed files' commit timestamps will be older than
>> the branch commit timestamps.
>>
>> Howev
ar because they haven't been committed to master.
Instead, under my proposal, each will get the timestamp of its prior commit.
If you're doing a merge, it will entail a commit and, again, the modified files
will be newer.
I don't think your use case breaks my proposal.
- Andrew Wol
ted.
When repository servers have different clocks - which is normal - each
clone/merge/push should record the time offset. Each timestamp on each commit
should be corrected to the repository's specific time, and that should be a
marking on the history.
Sincere regards,
Andrew Wolfe
3 matches
Mail list logo