Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:08:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andrew Eikum writes: > > > My worry is having "2." hang around for another decade or longer. I'd > > rather see X.0.0 denote a major feature release (currently represented > > as 1.X.0), with

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:10:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andrew Eikum writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> As a workaround to make life easier for third-party tools, the > >> upcoming major release will be ca

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > As a workaround to make life easier for third-party tools, the > upcoming major release will be called "Git 1.9.0" (not "Git 1.9"). > The first maintenance release for it will be "Git 1.9.1", and the > major release after "Git 1.9.0"