Hi,
Git v2.22.0-rc2 introduced 6 update messages, and let's start new round of git
l10n based on the following commit:
l10n: git.pot: v2.22.0 round 2 (6 new, 3 removed)
Generate po/git.pot from v2.22.0-rc2 for git v2.22.0 l10n round 2.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin
You can get
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:19 PM Bryan Turner wrote:
>
> I was looking through the commit history in a repository I work in and
> I found a place where someone had created a merge, but somewhere
> between "git merge" and "git commit" the fact that it was a merge was
> "lost". Instead they ended up
Hi Stolee,
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:21 PM Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
> On 4/9/2019 12:11 PM, Christian Couder wrote:
> > From: Christian Couder
> >
> > This is implemented for now by calling fetch_objects(). It fetches
> > from all the promisor remotes.
>
> Sorry for jumping on the thread late, bu
I was looking through the commit history in a repository I work in and
I found a place where someone had created a merge, but somewhere
between "git merge" and "git commit" the fact that it was a merge was
"lost". Instead they ended up with a really big commit that applied
all the changes from the
Currently, if a user wishes to have individual settings per branch, they
are required to manually keep track of the settings in their head and
manually set the options on the command-line or change the config at
each branch.
Teach config the "onbranch:" includeIf condition so that it can
condition
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:44:23PM -0400, Denton Liu wrote:
> Hi Junio,
>
> I've gotten rid of all the `format.*.coverSubject` stuff and replaced it
> with a generic `format.inferCoverSubject` that will read the subject
> from the branch description. I've also made `git branch -d` stop
> deleting
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
The second round of release candid
A release candidate Git v2.22.0-rc2 is now available for testing
at the usual places. It is comprised of 714 non-merge commits
since v2.21.0, contributed by 67 people, 17 of which are new faces.
The tarballs are found at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/testing/
The following pu
On 5/30/2019 4:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/2019 12:11 PM, Christian Couder wrote:
>>> From: Christian Couder
>>>
>>> +{
>>> + int i, missing_nr = 0;
>>> + int *missing = xcalloc(oid_nr, sizeof(*missing));
>>> + struct o
Hi,
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 4/9/2019 12:11 PM, Christian Couder wrote:
> > From: Christian Couder
> >
> > +{
> > + int i, missing_nr = 0;
> > + int *missing = xcalloc(oid_nr, sizeof(*missing));
> > + struct object_id *old_oids = *oids;
> > + struct object_id *new_
Am 30.05.19 um 20:59 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>
> On Thu, May 30 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> - Do not enforce (but assume) syntactic correctness of language
>> constructs that go into hunk headers: we only want to ensure that
>> the keywords actually are words and not just the ini
Thanks for the clarification. Funny that we are "staging" the patch
preparation to avoid real staging;-)
On 30/05/2019 20:43, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Philip,
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Philip Oakley wrote:
On 30/05/2019 15:53, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Having said that, there was a patch s
Hi Philip,
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Philip Oakley wrote:
> On 30/05/2019 15:53, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > Having said that, there was a patch series recently to add the ability to
> > stage individual lines,
>
> I believe that the git-gui (in tk/tcl, but using git commands) was
> already abl
Hi Gábor,
do you have any idea why Travis is failing like this in the macOS/gcc
job?
> +case "$jobname" in
> +brew link gcc@8
> Error: No such keg: /usr/local/Cellar/gcc@8
> The command "ci/install-dependencies.sh" failed and exited with 1 during .
I usually only look at the Azure Pipelines (whi
Hi, some minor comments.
On 30/05/2019 15:53, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi James,
On Wed, 29 May 2019, James Harvey wrote:
When adding interactively, 's' can be used to split the current hunk.
Once it gets down to where 's' reports "Sorry, cannot split this
hunk", it could be useful if it wo
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:57:23PM -0400, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> I'd also suggest keeping the "oidset omits" inside each of the
> sub-structures, but that's just me.
I just reminded myself that the omits need to be outside of the specialized
sub-structures because the combine filter logic needs t
On Thu, May 30 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> - Do not enforce (but assume) syntactic correctness of language
> constructs that go into hunk headers: we only want to ensure that
> the keywords actually are words and not just the initial part of
> some identifier.
>
> - In the word regex, mat
Improve and complete the list of required email related Perl modules,
clarifying which are core Perl modules and remove Net::SMTP::SSL.
git-send-email uses the TLS support in the Net::SMTP core module from
recent versions of Perl. Documenting the minimum version is complex
because of separate numb
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:12:06AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > + union {
> > + struct {
>
> Name this, and the ohter two union members, and the union itself as
> one member inside the outer struct; some compilers would be unhappy
> with the GCC extension that allows you to refer t
On 5/30/2019 11:01 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
> * ds/object-info-for-prefetch-fix (2019-05-28) 1 commit
> - sha1-file: split OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH
>
>>>
I decided to take a stab at a full review of the test coverage report in
order to try and understand all of the uncovered code. The snippets I
highlight below include uncovered code that is not immediately obvious as
an acceptable block to leave uncovered. (Some snippets required looking
around at
Hi. I'm running git version 2.13.2.windows.1. My coworker has the same
behavior with 2.21.0.windows.1.
I recently set up a git submodule by doing "git submodule add
https://github.com/VoltServer/example";. Based on our teams preference, I then
tried to update .gitmodules to use the alternate
Hi,
I wanted to follow up from last week. Did you receive the email I sent you?
Our company manufactures USB Flash Drives, printed with your logo. They
make the perfect marketing tool for your business or organization.
We offer low minimum quantities, and all memory sizes. Over 150 Stock
Model
On 4/9/2019 12:11 PM, Christian Couder wrote:
> From: Christian Couder
>
> This is implemented for now by calling fetch_objects(). It fetches
> from all the promisor remotes.
Hi Christian,
Sorry for jumping on the thread late, but I noticed some peculiarities
when looking at the test coverage r
- Do not enforce (but assume) syntactic correctness of language
constructs that go into hunk headers: we only want to ensure that
the keywords actually are words and not just the initial part of
some identifier.
- In the word regex, match numbers only when they begin with a digit,
but then
Matthew DeVore writes:
> +struct filter_data {
> + /* Used by all filter types. */
> struct oidset *omits;
> +
> + enum list_objects_filter_result (*filter_object_fn)(
> + struct repository *r,
> + enum list_objects_filter_situation filter_situation,
> +
Hi Peff,
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > >> * ds/object-info-for-prefetch-fix (2019-05-28) 1 commit
> > >> - sha1-file: split OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH
> > >>
> > >> Code cleanup.
> > >>
> > >> Will merge to 'next'.
>
On 30/05/2019 13:04, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
>> -Wmissing-field-initializer.
>>
>> We have two sorts of initializers:
>>
>> - zero initializers: they just want to nu
Hi James,
On Wed, 29 May 2019, James Harvey wrote:
> When adding interactively, 's' can be used to split the current hunk.
> Once it gets down to where 's' reports "Sorry, cannot split this
> hunk", it could be useful if it would then start splitting based on
> empty lines, probably leaving empty
On 5/29/2019 7:27 PM, Matthew DeVore wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:29:14PM -0400, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
Was sparse:path filter the only reason for needing all the URL encoding?
The sparse:oid form allows values : and these (or at least
the portion) may contain special characters. So don
Here is today's test coverage report. You can view it in HTML [1] or
download the plain-text version [2], also pasted below.
Thanks,
-Stolee
[1] https://derrickstolee.github.io/git-test-coverage/reports/2019-05-30.htm
[2] https://derrickstolee.github.io/git-test-coverage/reports/2019-05-30.txt
-
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich wende mich an Sie, da ich der Meinung bin, dass sich die von Ihnen auf der
Webseite angebotenen Produkte ausgezeichnet dazu eignen, im Internet gefördert
zu werden.
Deshalb möchte ich Ihnen die Tools anbieten, die es erlauben, den Verkauf von
Ihren Produkten u
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
> -Wmissing-field-initializer.
>
> We have two sorts of initializers:
>
> - zero initializers: they just want to null out every field,
>like CHILD_PROCESS_INIT
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:06:18AM +, Vanak, Ibrahim wrote:
> After cloning when I tried to checkout a branch on HPUX and Linux, I
> still significant time difference there as well even though network is
> not involve here. Do you suspect anything with HPUX OS? Do you have
> any mechanism to f
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 07:54:44PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 29.05.19 um 03:17 schrieb Jeff King:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 01:34:32AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> >> Parsing trees with symlinks twice is not ideal, but keeps the set
> >> structure simple -- a standard oidset suffices.
> >
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:53:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> * ds/object-info-for-prefetch-fix (2019-05-28) 1 commit
> >> - sha1-file: split OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH
> >>
> >> Code cleanup.
> >>
> >> Will merge to 'next'.
> >
> > I think this one is actually a bug-fix (we are refusing
Hi Ramsay,
I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
-Wmissing-field-initializer.
We have two sorts of initializers:
- zero initializers: they just want to null out every field,
like CHILD_PROCESS_INIT and ad-hoc initializers of structs
such as xpparam_t pp = { 0 }
37 matches
Mail list logo
