Duy Nguyen writes:
> I feel lost (and the answer "go read partial clone code!" is perfectly
> acceptable) but why would we need to diff trees of two different
> repositories?
It's just a speculation into far future to open possibilities of
what we cannot do right now. There is no *NEED*, just l
Piotr Krukowiecki writes:
>> If a real person making commits uses their own account (just on that
>> machine), he or she can set up `user.name` and `user.email` settings in
>> the per-user Git configuration file
>
> There is one common "test" (Windows) account which is used both by
> automatic te
A question came up on Stack Overflow[1], and then again through our
support channels, about "git push --atomic" and a behavior mismatch
between HTTP(S) and SSH. I'm easily able to reproduce the behavior,
but I don't see anything Bitbucket Server-related about how this works
(and I get exactly the s
On 2019-04-08 21:36, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Philip Oakley wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matheus
>>
>> On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the
GSoC work because of the MS W
On 2019-04-08 13:16, Sven Strickroth wrote:
> A path such as 'c:/somepath/submodule/../.git/modules/submodule' wasn't
> resolved correctly any more, because the *nix variant of
> offset_1st_component is used instead of the Win32 specific version.
>
> Regression was introduced in commit
> 25d90d1cb7
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:28:19PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Taylor Blau wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 03:44:25PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Eric Sunshine writes:
> > > >> > > + git cat-file commit $commit |
> > > >> > > + per
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 03:44:25PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Eric Sunshine writes:
> > >> > > + git cat-file commit $commit |
> > >> > > + perl -lpe "/^author/ && print q(parent $blob)" \
> > >> > > + >broken-commit
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Sven Strickroth wrote:
> A path such as 'c:/somepath/submodule/../.git/modules/submodule' wasn't
> resolved correctly any more, because the *nix variant of
> offset_1st_component is used instead of the Win32 specific version.
I'm not a win32 expe
Hi Junio,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 03:44:25PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:24 PM Jeff King wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:50:33PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> >> > > + git cat-file commit $commit |
> >> > > + perl -lpe "/
Hi Ævar,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 11:00:19PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 05 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:42:29PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> >
> >> > > Don't run git commands upstream of a pipe, because the pipe hides
> >> > > their exit code.
Hi Peff,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:41:13AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 10:36:48PM -0700, Taylor Blau wrote:
>
> > > > Of those, I think (3) is probably the best path forward. However, this
> > > > patch does none of them. In the name of expediently fixing the
> > > > regress
Hi Kapil,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:07:12PM +0530, Kapil Jain wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kapil Jain
> ---
>
> In read-cache, the read_index_from() function had a TODO task,
> this patch completes that. There are some other functions in the same file
> where this exact TODO needs to be done, will pr
Hi Kapil,
Welcome to Git! I am thrilled to see new faces on the mailing list.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 05:43:56PM +0530, Kapil Jain wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:33 PM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > trace2 API can already take 'struct repository' (the_repository is a
> > pointer to 'struct reposit
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 03:41:27PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > Subject: [[GSoC][PATCH …]] In notes-merge.c updated notes_merge_commit()
>
> Commit messages are usually in the format ": description>". So a better title might be "notes-merge: use
> dir-iterator in notes_merge_comm
On 2019.04.09 00:23, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:46 PM Josh Steadmon wrote:
> >
> > Helped-By: Jonathan Tan
> > Helped-By: Jeff King
> > Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
>
> Your S-o-B is duplicated an th
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:46 PM Josh Steadmon wrote:
>
> Helped-By: Jonathan Tan
> Helped-By: Jeff King
> Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder
> Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
Your S-o-B is duplicated an there is a spurious line between the
duplicated lines. Do you use a
On 04/08, Kapil Jain wrote:
> while understanding add_index_entry_with_check()
> i got to do_invalidate_path().
>
> the commit hash for do_invalidate_path() function is
> `749864627c2d3c33bbc56d7ba0b5542af698cc40`
>
> in the commit message it is explained that, cache-tree is used to
> store objec
On 2019.04.08 13:28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
> > unique (AFAICT "actually unique" in practice) in the parallel in-flight
> > jh/trace2-sid-fix
> > (https://public-inbox.org/git/4352952677a11776a18ec9b6862cf358307cfafd.1553879063.git.gitgitgad...@gmail.com/)
> >
>
For large repositories, enumerating the list of all promisor objects (in
order to exclude them from a rev-list walk) can take a significant
amount of time).
When --exclude-promisor-objects is passed to rev-list, don't enumerate
the promisor objects. Instead, filter them (and any children objects)
On 2019.04.04 17:09, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> On 2019.04.04 20:00, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:47:26PM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> >
> > > > Did you (or anybody else) have any thoughts on the case where a given
> > > > object is referred to both by a promisor and a non-promisor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:13:17PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:19:30PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> >
> >> > /* global flag to enable extra checks when accessing packed objects */
> >> > -extern int do_check_packed_object_crc;
> >> > +int do
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> Hi Matheus
>
> On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
> >> Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the
> >> GSoC work because of the MS Windows definition of uInt / long to be only
> >> 32 bits, lea
Hi Matheus
On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote:
Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the
GSoC work because of the MS Windows definition of uInt / long to be only
32 bits, leading to much of the Git code failing on the Git for Windows
port and on t
> > Teach "clone" the same ability, except that because "clone" already
> > has "-o" for another parameter, teach "clone" only to receive
> > "--server-option".
>
> Can you give an example of what this would be used for? An example I
> can think of might be
>
> git clone --server-option=pr
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 6:26 AM Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2019 02:23, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder
> > wrote:
> >>> Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store
> >>> objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are
>
> > + # NEEDSWORK: When using HTTP(S), protocol v0 supports a "half-auth"
> > + # configuration with authentication required only when downloading
> > + # objects and not refs, by having the HTTP server only require
> > + # authentication for the "git-upload-pack" path and not "info/refs".
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 7:52 PM Christian Couder
wrote:
>
> Hi Matheus
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:48 PM Matheus Tavares Bernardino
> wrote:
> >
> > This is my proposal for GSoC with the subject "Make pack access code
> > thread-safe".
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I'm late in schedule but I would like to a
>From Damien Robert, Mon 08 Apr 2019 at 16:53:40 (+0200) :
> > Others may have a better idea, but I do not immediately see any
> > solution better than inventing a new option to "git pull".
So here is a RFC patch that implements --no-fetch. (I am not sure about
the wording of the documentation, an
On 4/8/19 5:48 AM, Michael Platings wrote:
Hi David,
You also get an out-of-memory error with the patch Barret posted at
the start of this thread.
I think I see the issue, and will fix it when I repost the patch set.
Barret
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 AM Christian Couder
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:32 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:23 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:32 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:23 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder
> > wrote:
> > > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store
> > > > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. T
On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>>> Add a test for the error() case in alt_odb_usable() where an alternate
>>> directory doesn't exist. This behavior has b
On 01/04/2019 11:09, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:32 PM Phillip Wood wrote:
From: Phillip Wood
When cherry-picking or reverting a sequence of commits and if the final
pick/revert has conflicts and the user uses `git commit` to commit the
conflict resolution and does not run `
On Mon, Apr 08 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 08 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>>
>> > When 'git blame' is invoked without specifying the commit to start
>> > blaming from, it starts from the given file's state i
>From Junio C Hamano, Mon 08 Apr 2019 at 10:34:07 (+0900) :
> In that simpler world, what you are trying to do would have been:
> git fetch
> # did I get anything worth integrating?
> git merge FETCH_HEAD
Indeed.
> That obviously would not work for those with "pull.rebase", and
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 08 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>
> > When 'git blame' is invoked without specifying the commit to start
> > blaming from, it starts from the given file's state in the work tree.
> > However, when invoked in a b
while understanding add_index_entry_with_check()
i got to do_invalidate_path().
the commit hash for do_invalidate_path() function is
`749864627c2d3c33bbc56d7ba0b5542af698cc40`
in the commit message it is explained that, cache-tree is used to
store object names of index file objects and it is kept
On 01/04/2019 09:34, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Phillip Wood writes:
From: Phillip Wood
If the user commits a conflict resolution using 'git commit' during a
sequence of picks then 'git status' missed the fact that a
cherry-pick/revert is still in progress.
How well would this play with the pre
Hi Junio
On 01/04/2019 09:28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Phillip Wood writes:
From: Phillip Wood
When cherry-picking or reverting a sequence of commits and if the final
pick/revert has conflicts and the user uses `git commit` to commit the
conflict resolution and does not run `git cherry-pick --
- Control+BackSpace: Delete word to the left of the cursor.
- Control+Delete : Delete word to the right of the cursor.
Originally introduced by BRIEF and Turbo Vision between 1985 and 1992,
they were adopted by most CUA-Compliant UIs, including those of: OS/2,
Windows, Mac OS, Qt, GTK, Open/Libr
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:51 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 08 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:34 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> Damien Robert writes:
> >>
> >> > is there a way to do a git pull without it running git fetch?
> >> > Looking at the so
On Mon, Apr 08 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:34 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Damien Robert writes:
>>
>> > is there a way to do a git pull without it running git fetch?
>> > Looking at the source in builtin/pull.c does not seem to indicate so.
>>
>> The reason behind tha
On Mon, Apr 08 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> When 'git blame' is invoked without specifying the commit to start
> blaming from, it starts from the given file's state in the work tree.
> However, when invoked in a bare repository without a start commit,
> then there is no work tree state to start f
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
> Piotr Krukowiecki writes:
>
> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jakub Narebski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Better though is to focus on what you want, namely to prevent accidental
> >>> commits without specified author, instead of how you want to a
A path such as 'c:/somepath/submodule/../.git/modules/submodule' wasn't
resolved correctly any more, because the *nix variant of
offset_1st_component is used instead of the Win32 specific version.
Regression was introduced in commit
25d90d1cb72ce51407324259516843406142fe89.
Signed-off-by: Sven St
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 6:00 PM Kapil Jain wrote:
> for finding that commit message did you do something like this:
> git log -L :repo_read_index_unmerged:read-cache.c
No. I'm old fashioned. I just do "git log --patch --follow "
then search read_index_unmerged, which should at least appear in the
Piotr Krukowiecki writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jakub Narebski wrote:
>>>
>>> Better though is to focus on what you want, namely to prevent accidental
>>> commits without specified author, instead of how you want to achieve it,
>>> i.e. using --author to provide both author and commi
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> Sometimes when I don't understand what some code does, I look at "git
> log --patch". In this case, there a big explanation in ad3762042a
> (read-cache: fix directory/file conflict handling in
> read_index_unmerged(), 2018-07-31) that might help
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:49 PM Kapil Jain wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:09 AM Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> >
> > On 04/07, Kapil Jain wrote:
> > >
> > > what is the use of ce_stage macro ?
> > > tells about stage of an index entry.
> > > if ce_stage says, stage #0 i.e staging area, then that
Am Mo., 8. Apr. 2019 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Junio C Hamano :
>
> "Adam Nielsen" writes:
>
> A few notes on the form.
>
> > From: Adam Nielsen
>
> This "author" identity and the name-email on the Signed-off-by: line
> should match, at least for this project. I cannot tell which one is
> your prefer
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:06 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
> >> Avoid a usage of the_repository by propagating the configured repository
> >> to add_if_missing(). Also, prefetch only if the repository being diffed
> >> is the_repository (because we do not support lazy fetching
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:59 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Christian Couder writes:
>
> > I will at least add something telling that in most cases
> > "repository_format_partial_clone" and fetch_objects() shouldn't be
> > used directly anymore.
>
> Yes, that would be necessary not in the log, but i
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA.
FCT -ABUJA
PAYMENT NOTIFICATION
PAYMENT 2019:
Attn:Beneficiary,
We the entire members of Federal House of Senate,The office of
Presidency,Directors of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation,on
behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigerian u
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:12 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> You can still do
>
> git -c user.name=me -c user.email=m...@my.addre.ss commit ...
[...]
> GIT_COMMITTER_NAME=me GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL=m...@my.addre.ss \
> git commit --author=me ...
>
> even though it is not any shorter ;-).
There are a
Hi David,
You also get an out-of-memory error with the patch Barret posted at
the start of this thread.
I'm sorry you interpreted my message as declaring it somebody else's
problem, that definitely wasn't my intent. I merely ran out of time to
investigate further and I figure Barret is going to be
On 08/04/2019 02:23, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder
wrote:
Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store
objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are
created by[3]:
1. listing objects;
2. sorting the list with some good heuri
Christian Couder writes:
> Patch 3f82acbca2 (Use promisor_remote_get_direct() and
> has_promisor_remote(), 2019-04-01) in cc/multi-promisor starts with:
>
> Use promisor_remote_get_direct() and has_promisor_remote()
>
> Instead of using the repository_format_partial_clone global
> and
"Dr. Adam Nielsen" writes:
A few notes on the form.
> From: Adam Nielsen
This "author" identity and the name-email on the Signed-off-by: line
should match, at least for this project. I cannot tell which one is
your preference, and I do not have any preference over your name
either ;-), but pl
58 matches
Mail list logo
