I have important transaction for you as next of kin to claim US$18.37m Mail me
on my private email: chimwia...@gmail.com
so I can send you more details
Thanks
Mr.Chim Wai Kim
MOVE TO INBOX===
DISCLAIMER: This email and any files it contains are confidential and
From: George Vanburgh
When importing from multiple perforce paths - we may attempt to import
a changelist that contains files from two (or more) of these depot
paths. Currently, this results in multiple git commits - one
containing the changes, and the other(s) as empty commit(s). This
behavior w
Hi,
On 12/14/2016 08:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> -/* We will introduce the 'interactive rebase' mode later */
>> static inline int is_rebase_i(const struct replay_opts *opts)
>> {
>> -return 0;
>> +return opts->action == REPLAY_INTERACTIVE_REBASE;
>> }
Hi Pranit,
On 12/16/2016 08:35 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Stephan Beyer wrote:
>> On 10/14/2016 04:14 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>>> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
>>> index d84ba86..c542e8b 100644
>>> --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
>
Since 6b4b013f18 (mailinfo: handle in-body header continuations,
2016-09-20, v2.11.0) mailinfo.c has contained new code with an
assert of the form:
assert(call_a_function(...))
The function in question, check_header, has side effects. This
means that when NDEBUG is defined during a relea
Hi Pranit,
On 12/16/2016 08:00 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>>> I don't understand why the return value is int and not void. To avoid a
>>> "return 0;" line when calling this function?
>>
>> Initially I thought I would be using the return value but
> On 17 Dec 2016, at 15:28, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Dec 2016, at 21:32, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> For the last two days, I've noticed t0021.15 on the 'pu' branch has been
>> failing intermittently (well it fails with: 'make test >ptest-out', but
>> when run by hand
> The previous versions were:
>
> RFC: https://github.com/chriscool/git/commits/config-split-index7
> v1: https://github.com/chriscool/git/commits/config-split-index72
The diff since v1 is:
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 8fbef25cb1..52a3cac4ff 100644
-
This way a share index file will not be garbage collected if
we still read from an index it is based from.
As we need to read the current index before creating a new
one, the tests have to be adjusted, so that we don't expect
an old shared index file to be deleted right away when we
create a new o
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 6 +++---
Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 37 +
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 8fbef25cb1.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index a0ab66aae7..dc44d8a417 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ core.trus
Everytime split index is turned on, it creates a "sharedindex."
file in the git directory. This change makes sure that shared index
files that haven't been used for a long time are removed when a new
shared index file is created.
The new "splitIndex.sharedIndexExpire" config variable is create
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 08f638c65c..8fbef25cb1 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2776,6 +2776,17 @
When writing a new split-index and there is a big number of cache
entries in the split-index compared to the shared index, it is a
good idea to regenerate the shared index.
By default when the ratio reaches 20%, we will push back all
the entries from the split-index into a new shared index file
in
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 72 ++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index 507a1dd1ad..f03addf654 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split-i
It looks better and is simpler to review when we don't compute
the same things many times in the function.
It will also help make the following commit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rea
This will make us use the split-index feature or not depending
on the value of the "core.splitIndex" config variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
read-cache.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index db5d910642..79aae6bd20 1
When a split-index file is created, let's update the mtime of the
shared index file that the split-index file is referencing.
In a following commit we will make shared index file expire
depending on their mtime, so updating the mtime makes sure that
the shared index file will not be deleted soon.
This function will be used in a following commit to get the expiration
time of the shared index files from the config, and it is generic
enough to be put in "config.c".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/gc.c | 15 ++-
cache.h | 3 +++
config.c | 13 +
Also use the functions in cmd_update_index() in
builtin/update-index.c.
These functions will be used in a following commit to tweak
our use of the split-index feature depending on the setting
of a configuration variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
builtin/update-index.c | 18 ++
This function will be used in a commit soon, so let's make
it available globally.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 3 +++
sha1_file.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index e15b421b6f..f442f28189 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/c
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 44
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index f03addf654..f448fc13cd 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split-index.s
When users are using `git update-index --(no-)split-index`, they
may expect the split-index feature to be used or not according to
the option they just used, but this might not be the case if the
new "core.splitIndex" config variable has been set. In this case
let's warn about what will happen and
Goal
We want to make it possible to use the split-index feature
automatically by just setting a new "core.splitIndex" configuration
variable to true.
This can be valuable as split-index can help significantly speed up
`git rebase` especially along with the work to libify `git apply`
that has
This new function will be used in a following commit to know
if we want to use the split index feature or not.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 1 +
config.c | 10 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index a50a61a197..c126fe475e 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
t/t1700-split-index.sh | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t1700-split-index.sh b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
index 292a0720fc..db8c39f446 100755
--- a/t/t1700-split-index.sh
+++ b/t/t1700-split-index.sh
@@ -2
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
config.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
index 83fdecb1bc..2eaf8ad77a 100644
--- a/config.c
+++ b/config.c
@@ -1701,8 +1701,8 @@ int git_config_get_untracked_cache(void)
if (!strcasecmp
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
b/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
index 7386c93162..e091b2a409 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
+++ b/Documentatio
This new function will be used in a following commit to get the
value of the "splitIndex.maxPercentChange" config variable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
cache.h | 1 +
config.c | 15 +++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index c126fe475e..e15b
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder
---
Documentation/config.txt | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index dc44d8a417..08f638c65c 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2763,6 +2763,19
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 17/12/16 08:38, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>>
>>> * kn/ref-filter-branch-list (2016-12-08) 20 commits
>>> - branch: implement '--format' option
>>> - branch: use ref-filter printing APIs
>>> - branch, tag: use porcelain outpu
> On 16 Dec 2016, at 21:32, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> For the last two days, I've noticed t0021.15 on the 'pu' branch has been
> failing intermittently (well it fails with: 'make test >ptest-out', but
> when run by hand, it fails only say 1-in-6, 1-in-18, etc.).
>
> [yes, it's a bi
On 17/12/16 08:38, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>
>> * kn/ref-filter-branch-list (2016-12-08) 20 commits
>> - branch: implement '--format' option
>> - branch: use ref-filter printing APIs
>> - branch, tag: use porcelain output
>> - ref-filter: allow porcelain to translate messages in the
UNICODE_STRING::Length field means size of buffer in bytes[1], despite of buffer
itself being array of wchar_t. Because of that terminating zero is placed twice
as far. Fix it.
[1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa380518.aspx
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov
---
Access outsi
From: "Jacob Keller"
From: Jacob Keller
Commit c8ba16391655 ("parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helper",
2011-06-09) added the OPT_STRING_LIST as a way to accumulate a repeated
list of strings. However, this was not documented in the
api-parse-options documentation. Add documentation now so t
Hello,
>
> * kn/ref-filter-branch-list (2016-12-08) 20 commits
> - branch: implement '--format' option
> - branch: use ref-filter printing APIs
> - branch, tag: use porcelain output
> - ref-filter: allow porcelain to translate messages in the output
> - ref-filter: add an 'rstrip=' option to
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Although I do not think we should spend too much braincycles on this
> one (we should rather just removing the older one soonish), I think
> this patch is going in a wrong direction. I agree that "the last
> one wins" is a bit hard to see (
37 matches
Mail list logo