On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Antoine Delaite
wrote:
> Hello Git community,
>
>
> We are a team of five students from the ENSIMAG (a french school of
> engineering and computer science) who are going to contribute to git during a
> month at least and after if we have the opportunity. We will
On 05/18/2015 04:28 PM, John McIntyre wrote:
> 2015-05-18 11:26 GMT+01:00 Heiko Voigt :
>> If you want a simple tool using ssh-keys have a look at gitolite[1].
>> It quite simple to setup and with it you can specify all kinds of access
>> rights.
>
> That's adding a separate level of complexity.
Sébastien Guimmara writes:
> 'git help' shows common commands in alphabetical order:
>
> The most commonly used git commands are:
>addAdd file contents to the index
>bisect Find by binary search the change that introduced a bug
>branch List, create, or delete branches
On 18/05/15 18:59, FusionX86 wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of a way to 'git p4 clone' and exclude files by type or
name? For example, I want to clone a depot, but not pull down any .exe
files. Haven't been able to find an answer in docs or other searches.
I think you can use a client spec which ex
Jeff King writes:
> What do you want to do with the "verbose" calls I have been sprinkling
> through the test suite (and the function itself)? Leave them or remove
> them? A grep for "verbose " (with the trailing space) shows some
> examples.
That was one of the things I wanted to do next, as I
Hi Paul,
I already commented on patches 1-10, and I will look in depth at 11-14 tomorrow.
It is a very pleasant read so far. Thank you.
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: I have the feeling about patch 12 that reading `opt_rebase` from the
config could be delayed until after we know that the user did not speci
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> When looking through existing tests to point out good style I came across
>> t1020, which has a test commented out and the comment wasn't helping me
>> either of what the test should accomplish in the future. The code of the
>> test is the same
Since cd67e4d (Teach 'git pull' about --rebase, 2007-11-28),
fetch+rebase could be set by default by defining the config variable
branch..rebase. This setting can be overriden on the command line
by --rebase and --no-rebase.
Since 6b37dff (pull: introduce a pull.rebase option to enable --rebase,
2
This series directly depends on the changes made in jc/merge and
pt/pull-tests. The commit messages assume that the behavioral changes
proposed in pt/pull-log-n, pt/pull-tags-error-diag, pt/pull-ff-vs-merge-ff,
and [1] have been introduced.
git-pull is a commonly executed command to check for new
Hi Paul,
On 2015-05-18 15:54, Paul Tan wrote:
> diff --git a/git-pull.sh b/git-pull.sh
> index 633c385..67f825c 100755
> --- a/git-pull.sh
> +++ b/git-pull.sh
> @@ -4,13 +4,53 @@
> #
> # Fetch one or more remote refs and merge it/them into the current HEAD.
>
> -USAGE='[-n | --no-stat] [--[no
Since b814da8 (pull: add pull.ff configuration, 2014-01-15) git-pull
supported setting --(no-)ff via the pull.ff configuration value.
However, as it only matches the string values of "true" and "false", it
does not support other boolean aliases such as "on", "off", "1", "0".
This is inconsistent wi
Since efb779f (merge, pull: add '--(no-)log' command line option,
2008-04-06) git-pull supported the (--no-)log switch and would pass it
to git-merge.
96e9420 (merge: Make '--log' an integer option for number of shortlog
entries, 2010-09-08) implemented support for the --log= switch, which
would e
Since b10ac50 (Fix pulling into the same branch., 2005-08-25), git-pull,
upon detecting that git-fetch updated the current head, will
fast-forward the working tree to the updated head commit.
Implement tests to ensure that the fast-forward occurs in such a case,
as well as to ensure that the user-
13 matches
Mail list logo
