On 09/21/2013 12:51 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> I also agree that the documentation is misstated; "remote-tracking branch"
>> may have been a convenient and well understood phrase for whoever wrote
>> that part, but the --prune is designed to cull extra refs in the
>>
Hi,
The development of packv4 is fun. Like git, patches are exchanged over
email. But the series is long and sometimes I want to modify or even
drop an old patch without sending 90 mails to the list. I wonder if we
should teach git-am more about patch manipulation so that git am could
be told to:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'.
>
>Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d
>is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not
>going to apply any patch, even if it's what most users want.
Please sto
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>David Aguilar wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> Will this not c
- describe when it is still applicable
- tell people where to go for most normal cases
Signed-off-by: Sitaram Chamarty
---
ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/159633. Yes
it's very old but better late than never.
Documentation/howto/setup-git-server-over-http.txt
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>David Aguilar wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>> >wrote:
>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>> >wrote:
>>
>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own
>gitconfig?
>> >>
>> >>>
r.duc...@gmail.com writes:
> mmm maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the first statement
> on the index (above) is oversimplifing.
Yes, it was simplified to illustrate the principle, not even trying
to be exhaustive.
The principle is that we allow you to check out a different branch
when yo
Jeff King writes:
> But I think that points to a larger problem, which is that we do
> not want to just look at the entries that are different between the
> tree and the index.
True. The unpack-trees API knows how to walk the index and trees in
parallel, and I tend to agree that
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I also agree that the documentation is misstated; "remote-tracking branch"
> may have been a convenient and well understood phrase for whoever wrote
> that part, but the --prune is designed to cull extra refs in the
> hierarchies into
> which refs would be fetched if coun
Jens Lehmann writes:
> Am 10.09.2013 00:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * bc/submodule-status-ignored (2013-09-04) 2 commits
>> - submodule: don't print status output with ignore=all
>> - submodule: fix confusing variable name
>>
>> Originally merged to 'next' on 2013-08-22
>>
>> Will merge
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>>
>>> When one performance test fails, the testing is aborted and the cleanup
>>> commands are not executed anymore, leaving the trash directory in the
>>> failed state.
>>
>> Ah, that I overlooked. In that case, the
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
The fifth batch of topics are in 'master'. We are about to pass 350
non-merge commits since the last release, which means we are halfway
there
- Ursprungligt meddelande -
> Från: "Ram Kunchur"
> Till: git@vger.kernel.org
> Kopia: "Daren Scott" , "Rajen Shah"
> , "Sagar Keluskar"
>
> Skickat: fredag, 20 sep 2013 16:17:38
> Ämne: GIT Plug-in for PowerBuilder
>
> Hello Team,
> We wish to use GITSCC plug-in with PowerBu
David Aguilar wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
> >wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
> >wrote:
>
> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
> >>
> >>> You mean people that provide their
Jeff King writes:
> So I think it should be possible to fix our internal consumers
> ... I'm a little wary
> of external consumers that might get confused by it.
Yeah, thanks for a good summary of analysis. I agree that it would
be doable, but it is dubious if it is worth it.
>
> ---
> diff -
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:17:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Commit a908047 taught format-patch the "--from" option,
> > which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
> > and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
> > documentation clai
Hi Toralf,
Toralf Förster wrote:
> When run that command immediate after "git bisect start" somebody sees
> the full commit range as defined in "git bisect start".
>
> However running that command later after few git bisect steps" somebody
> is just presented with the remaining commit interval.
>
On 09/20/2013 08:22 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Toralf,
>
> Toralf Förster wrote:
>
>> When run that command immediate after "git bisect start" somebody sees
>> the full commit range as defined in "git bisect start".
>>
>> However running that command later after few git bisect steps" somebod
When run that command immediate after "git bisect start" somebody sees
the full commit range as defined in "git bisect start".
However running that command later after few git bisect steps" somebody
is just presented with the remaining commit interval.
Is this intended ?
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf
Jeff King writes:
> Commit a908047 taught format-patch the "--from" option,
> which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
> and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
> documentation claims that it will omit the in-body header
> when it is the same as the rfc822 h
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>wrote:
>>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>wrote:
Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
>>
>>> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean
>> distr
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:22:01AM +0930, Martin Gregory wrote:
>
>> When something goes wrong, there appears to be no way to understand what
>> git thinks it's reading. I'm not sure if such a way, if it existed, would
>> help with
>> trailing spaces, but if you could say
>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jeff King writes:
> My original question was going to be: why bother peeling at all if we
> are just going to push the outer objects, anyway?
>
> And after staring at it, I somehow convinced myself that the answer was
> that you were pushing both. But that is not the case. Sorry for the
> noise.
Hello Team,
We wish to use GITSCC plug-in with PowerBuilder for application
source-control with GIT GUI,
We downloaded GitScc.msi setup file from PushOK website, unfortunately when
file was downloaded and before we could initialize installation
Symantec Endpoint Protection reported the
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland
---
templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
index 586e3bf..68d62d5 100755
--- a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
+++ b/templates/h
Hi,
> Jeff King writes:
> > The keepalive patch is not in any released version yet, but we have been
> > running it in production at GitHub for a few weeks.
>
> That is good to hear; I'd feel safer to bump the scheduled
> graduation date to 'master' for the topic in that case.
>
> Like tomorrow
Dear Junio,
thanks for your answer and you availability to revise the man text. Below my
(irreverent) comments
On Thursday 19 September 2013 10:43:16 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Let's see how we can improve the text. Points to notice are:
>
> * "by updating the index and the files" does not say "
Make the user able to call `git push --notes` instead of
`git push refs/notes/*`
Signed-off-by: Rodolphe Belouin
---
Documentation/git-push.txt | 9 +++--
builtin/push.c | 9 +++--
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Do
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:38:17AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> I'm using notes in my project. I'm wondering if it's possible to save
> the state of the notes when I'm releasing/tagging a new version of my
> project so I can restore the saved notes state if I checkout back the
> old release.
>
Commit 05c1eb1 (push: teach --force-with-lease to smart-http
transport) fixed the compare-and-swap test in t5541. It
tried to mark the test as passing by teaching the test
helper function to expect an extra "success or failure"
parameter, but forgot to actually use the parameter in the
helper.
Sig
Commit a908047 taught format-patch the "--from" option,
which places the author ident into an in-body from header,
and uses the committer ident in the rfc822 from header. The
documentation claims that it will omit the in-body header
when it is the same as the rfc822 header, but the code never
impl
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:55:36PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not sure I understand correctly. I see that bitmaps can be used to
> > > > implement set operations. But how comes that walking the graph requires
> > > > a lot
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
