Ryan Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it just me, or does format-patch lose the commit comments during
> export? I haven't experimented with your new patches yet - and since
> I'm at OLS and playing with Git during my free time, my brain is pretty
> much shut down now - so if you have ha
I'll start by saying that, well, I'm pretty sure this patch is wrong.
I was trying to look at the changes between two commits, sanely, but
failed to find a tool or example in the tree that hinted at how to do
this.
After poking around at git-whatchanged trying to figure out what it is
trying to d
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:30:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Since I rebase my repostitory to fix up the history often, I
> needed a reliable way to preserve authorship information when I
> export the patches via format-patch and slurp them via applymbox.
Is it just me, or does format-patch l
The Deb packages were mising a dependency on "build install" from the
binary target - this fixes that, and cleans up some inconsistencies
elsewhere in the rulesets.
Traditionally, Debian packaging uses a file called "build-stamp" (or
"install-stamp", etc) in the main source tree. The initial deb
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wander what I should do with "cg-mkpatch" generated output; I had
> the impression that this should be usable with "cg-patch", but these
> are incompatible with each other. Forexample. if a commit contains
> permission changes, my generated patch
I wander what I should do with "cg-mkpatch" generated output; I had
the impression that this should be usable with "cg-patch", but these
are incompatible with each other. Forexample. if a commit contains
permission changes, my generated patch may look like this:
...
diff --gi
- avoid duplicating [PATCH] in the commit message body if the
original commit has it already (happens for commits done from
mails via applymbox).
- check if the commit author is different from the one who is
running the script, and emit an appropriate "From:" and
"Date: " lines to th
With "-c .dotest/0002" flag, the applymbox command can be told
to use existing .dotest/patch file after hand-fixing the patch
conflicts for the second patch in the mailbox, and continue on
from that message, skipping the already applied first patch in
.dotest/0001.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[
I was experimenting with applypatch and applymbox to see how it
feels like being Linus ;-) and also I saw some trivially correct
patches on the list floating unmerged during KS/OLS.
Since I rebase my repostitory to fix up the history often, I
needed a reliable way to preserve authorship informatio
Add --mbox option to export patches in a format resembling UNIX
mbox, so that later they can be concatenated and fed to
applymbox.
Add --check to look for lines that introduce bogus whitespaces.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
git-format-patch-script | 49 +++
Dear diary, on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:05:01PM CEST, I got a letter
where Jonas Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Fix displaying of an error message when cg-help is called with unknown
> command and use $USAGE so the correct cg-help usage string is printed.
> Drop useless use of cat in
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:58:11AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Fredrik Kuivinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > Hi,
>
> Hello from a lazy reader who didn't actually try it,
>
> > Gct v0.1 has been released and can
Fix displaying of an error message when cg-help is called with unknown
command and use $USAGE so the correct cg-help usage string is printed.
Drop useless use of cat in print_help(). Improve the asciidoc markup.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/cg-Xlib b/cg-Xlib
-
Recover the old behavior of the remote branch name
... specified in $_git/branches/$name and defaulting to master.
Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cg-pull |2 +-
cg-push |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cg-pull b/cg-pull
--- a/cg-p
Dear diary, on Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:50:31AM CEST, I got a letter
where Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> 3) upload Portfile's along with the .tar.gz's.
That's what we do with cogito.spec as well and it's fine. Just send me
an appropriate patch for the dist target.
> 2 of these
Dear diary, on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:34:43AM CEST, I got a letter
where James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > "Petr" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Petr> Huh. Well, you had to do uberweird things with your repository -
> Petr> why did you cg-seek at all? What Co
16 matches
Mail list logo
