On 5 February 2014 15:58:22 CET, Grant Edwards
wrote:
>On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On 4 February 2014 22:27:03 CET, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>>
>>>Are the VLAN configuration docs up to date?
>>>
>>>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handb
On 6 February 2014 15:31:58 CET, Grant Edwards
wrote:
>On 2014-02-06, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On 5 February 2014 15:58:22 CET, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>>>On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>> On 4 February 2014 22:27:03 CET, Grant Edwards
>>> wrote:
&g
On 6 February 2014 16:09:32 CET, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>On Thursday 06 Feb 2014 14:30:24 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 06/02/2014 08:19, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 05 Feb 2014 20:02:00 Joseph wrote:
>--->8
>> >> Here it is: grub.conf
>> >>
>> >> default 0
>> >> timeout 30
>> >>
>> >> t
On 6 February 2014 22:13:26 CET, Stroller
wrote:
>
>On Thu, 6 February 2014, at 3:35 pm, J. Roeleveld
>wrote:
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>A google seems to suggest this client is able to send plain-text
>messages.
>
>S
On 10 February 2014 09:13:37 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
>because you wrote "poll":
>
>$ loginctl show-session 1
>Id=1
>Timestamp=Mo 2014-02-10 08:45:40 CET
>TimestampMonotonic=28555352
>VTNr=7
>Display=:0
>Remote=no
>Service=gdm-password
>Scope=session-1.scope
>Leader=1352
>Audit=1
>Type
On 13 February 2014 17:55:19 CET, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>On 13/02/2014 18:35, Edward M wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 02:44:02 +0200
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/02/2014 02:40, Edward M wrote:
Howdy,
Been busy learning Linux :-) got new email other was getting
crowded.
On Fri, February 14, 2014 08:05, Edward M wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:13:19 +0530
> Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
>> My favorite firewall rule to do this don't restrict any kind of
>> traffic between own network and filter the rest.
>> Use ipset. Very easy.
>
> I have zero knowledge how ipsec
On Fri, February 14, 2014 08:05, Edward M wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:13:19 +0530
> Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
>> My favorite firewall rule to do this don't restrict any kind of
>> traffic between own network and filter the rest.
>> Use ipset. Very easy.
>
> I have zero knowledge how ipsec
On 14 February 2014 22:31:54 CET, Grant Edwards
wrote:
>On 2014-02-14, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
>>> I need to do some testing with kernels as far back as 2.6.25. I've
>>> currently got a Gentoo box that can build and run kernels ranging
>fr
On 18 February 2014 06:03:02 CET, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>Hello list!
>
>I'm planning to replace an Active Directory server currently
>functioning
>*only* as an LDAP server, with a dedicated Linux-based LDAP server.
>
>Now, the function of the LDAP server is at the moment:
>* Provide the settings dat
On Tue, February 18, 2014 10:47, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 05:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> I used to use cherokee. Fast, light, awesome, and with a web admin.
>> The init script always failed me. /etc/init.d/cherokee stop was not a
>> guaranteed stop to all forked cherokee processes -
On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>> oh? I can pipe that output into cat or any any daemon I like? Doesn't
>> look like so.
>
> But it does, you can "cat" with journalctl; it's one of its output
> options:
On Tue, February 18, 2014 12:54, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tue, February 18, 2014 10:47, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 18/02/2014 05:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>>> I used to use cherokee. Fast, light,
On Tue, February 18, 2014 12:17, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 11:52, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tue, February 18, 2014 10:47, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> What I do run into is daemons that drop privs on start up, like
>>> tac_plus. Unwary new sysadmins alway
On 19 February 2014 05:11:12 CET, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>On Feb 18, 2014 1:13 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>>
>> On 18 February 2014 06:03:02 CET, Pandu Poluan
>wrote:
>> >Hello list!
>> >
>> >I'm planning to replace an Active Directory s
On Wed, February 19, 2014 00:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 14:16, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tue, February 18, 2014 12:17, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> It's a little more complex than just that. It's an auth service and
>>> user
>>> are frequentl
On Tue, February 18, 2014 15:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:54 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> As I do not have systemd installed on any machine, I can't check the
>> man-pages.
>
> They are online [1].
Useful, but not necessary for this discu
On Tue, February 18, 2014 18:12, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Savchenko
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Every decent project has QA and unit tests one way or another. But
>> the larger project is, the more bugs it has. And I do not want bugs
>> in PID 1, that's why i
On Thu, February 20, 2014 06:34, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:00 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tue, February 18, 2014 18:12, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> [ snip ]
>
>>> Of course the larger a project is the *potential* number of bugs
On Thu, February 20, 2014 06:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:50 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tue, February 18, 2014 15:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:54 AM, J. Roeleveld
>>> wrote:
>> Same ques
On Fri, February 21, 2014 18:33, thegeezer wrote:
> On 02/20/2014 08:06 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> .. setting systemd to log to syslog to make transitions smoother (as
> logs are lost on reboot by default)
Eeerh, logs are lost on reboot?
I only had (it died last weekend) one (yes, ONE) machine that
On Thu, February 20, 2014 16:16, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 20/02/2014 11:16, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>>
>>
>> 20.02.2014 09:24, Canek Peláez Valdés пиÑеÑ:
>>> [ snip ]
but I do not see the point, beyond as a nice gimmick.
>>>
>>> Well, I *do* see a point. Many points, actually. You want
On Sat, February 22, 2014 06:27, Facundo Curti wrote:
> Hi all. I'm new in the list, this is my third message :)
> First at all, I need to say sorry if my english is not perfect. I speak
> spanish. I post here because gentoo-user-es it's middle dead, and it's a
> great chance to practice my english
On 4 March 2014 22:26:27 CET, Grant Edwards wrote:
>On 2014-03-04, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> It's not 100% apparent how the install works from reading the
>handbook,
>> you have to do it to see how it works. Do note that all distro
>installer
>> work in this general way, Gentoo just lets you see
On Fri, March 14, 2014 20:29, Guido Budack wrote:
> Good proposition but why?
> It works...
>
> Never change a running system :-/
For the sake of communication, please do NOT strip out the part of the
conversation you are replying to.
Also, do NOT restart the thread every time.
Thank you
--
Joos
On Sat, March 15, 2014 11:50, Guido Budack wrote:
> copy...
Last attempt:
- Do NOT strip previous conversations from the email you are replying to
- Do NOT CC people into the email, we are ALL subscribed to the list
On Sat, March 15, 2014 13:11, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:46:40 Guido Budack wrote:
>> strange...
>
> Guido, I don't know if this is a quirk of your mail client, but it makes
> difficult to follow the conversation in a thread.
>
> It helps if you do not trim out all of the message that
On 17 March 2014 18:27:42 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
>Is it correct that vmware-server is out of portage?
>
>I have to migrate and upgrade an old box again and it is running kernel
>2.6.25 ... now I have 3.10.25 and realise that it won't compile/run
>vmware-server ... *sigh*
>
>So Plan B
On 17 March 2014 18:44:15 CET, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>On 17 March 2014 18:27:42 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger"
>wrote:
>>
>>Is it correct that vmware-server is out of portage?
>>
>>I have to migrate and upgrade an old box again and it is running
&
On 17 March 2014 18:48:56 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 17.03.2014 18:46, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>> Yep, just checked wikipedia.
>> Got deprecated. Last version dates back to 2009.
>
>Yes, I also remember somehow ... so the evening will be spent with
&
On 17 March 2014 19:03:07 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 17.03.2014 18:53, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>> Good luck.
>> Mondays are always fun for that.
>>
>> I always prefer weekends for migrations like this.
>
>I wasn't asked.
>T
On Mon, March 17, 2014 19:35, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 17.03.2014 19:30, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>> I know. It usually comes at the least convenient moment.
>>
>> I do think it's the customers' fault for not keeping up with normal
>> maintenance sche
On 17 March 2014 20:52:29 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 17.03.2014 20:30, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>> I've been planning to try KVM as well, but am wondering how snapshots
>work
>> with KVM. Not been able to find anything about that apart from
>>
On 17 March 2014 21:18:37 CET, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 17.03.2014 21:15, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>>> Does anyone know if there is a trick applying these drivers
>*without*
>>> having a running VMware-Server?
>>
>> Try vmware pl
On 21 March 2014 12:24:04 CET, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:54:55 +0100
>"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>> > wrote:
>&
On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
>
> Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other
On Fri, March 21, 2014 14:20, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:41:54 +0100
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
>> > "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>>
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 07:53:22 AM Facundo Curti wrote:
> Hi list! :) First at all, I apologize if my english is not perfect,
> I know i'm not the only non-english speak on list, but I apologize any
> way jeje :P
>
> I'm trying to install XEN for first time on my gentoo desktop machine.
> my ha
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 05:47:53 PM Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> I'm not meaning to hijack this thread, but isn't KVM a better option? The
> difference between Xen and KVM is tiny I think, no?
Yes and no:
If you simpy look at the basics, like running virtual machines, then KVM is a
valid option
On Sun, March 23, 2014 19:26, Facundo Curti wrote:
> 2014-03-23 9:35 GMT-03:00 J. Roeleveld :
>> On Sunday, March 23, 2014 05:47:53 PM Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>>> I'm not meaning to hijack this thread, but isn't KVM a better option?
>>> The
>>> diff
On 24 March 2014 06:02:05 CET, Dale wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>This is confusing. A month or so ago, my HP 5300C scanner worked just
>fine. I plugged it in today, it doesn't show up. When I type lsusb, I
>get this:
>
>root@fireball / # lsusb
>Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root
>h
On 24 March 2014 08:04:08 CET, Dale wrote:
>J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> I see a lot of errors about
>> "Device not accepting address error -62"
>>
>> Did you google for that?
>> Sounds like an issue with the scanner itself.
>>
>> --
>> Joo
On Tue, March 25, 2014 16:35, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 21/03/14, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
>> Dale wrote:
>>
>> > So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
>> > change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
>> > y
On 13 April 2014 05:42:46 CEST, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>Hi,
>
>since some time seven package wont compile anymore:
>
> *
> * The following 7 packages have failed to build or install:
> *
>* (media-libs/mesa-10.0.4::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge), Log
>file:
> * '/var/tmp/portage/media
On Sat, April 19, 2014 16:52, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in search of the reason for the overlay problem
> reported previously I cam across this:
>
> solfire:/home/user>sudo xdriinfo
> libGL is too old.
> [1]23732 exit 1 sudo xdriinfo
> solfire:/home/user>
I get the same (no need
On 3 May 2014 12:12:09 CEST, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
>I see boot problems on two of my machines ... very likely related to
>lvm2 as far as I can tell so far.
>
>Downgraded and even disabled systemd, re-emerged stuff ... I am still
>at
>trying to find the reason. Maybe it is with the mdadm
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:28:03 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 12:12, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > I see boot problems on two of my machines ... very likely related to
> > lvm2 as far as I can tell so far.
> >
> > Downgraded and even disabled systemd, re-emerged stuff ... I
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:33:11 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 12:27, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > On 3 May 2014 12:12:09 CEST, "Stefan G. Weichinger"
wrote:
> >> I see boot problems on two of my machines ... very likely related to
> >
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:56:11 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 12:49, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > Interesting.
> > In your other email you mentioned you can access the LVM volumes using a
> > rescue-cd.
> > Are there any snapshots in there? Or did you d
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 01:06:03 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 12:54, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > I don't use systemd, but as it's pushed by Redhat and redhat, by default,
> > uses LVM, I would expect that part to work correctly together.
>
> Yes
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 01:12:45 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 13:05, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > dracut = initramfs
> > Did you update the initramfs recently? If out-of-sync with what is on the
> > "main" environment, it could lead to issues.
>
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 01:26:23 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 13:19, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > Sounds like an issue with the mdadm-raid devices.
> > Try setting those up WITHOUT systemctl (or init.d-scripts)
> >
> > Then checking
> > - /proc
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 01:39:06 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 13:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Am 03.05.2014 13:19, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> >> Sounds like an issue with the mdadm-raid devices.
> >> Try setting those up WITHOUT s
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 02:08:26 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 13:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > Booted with "rd.auto=1" and now I also get a funny start job
> > running/waiting for /dev/sda1 (/ on the SSD).
> >
> > Oh my! :-)
> >
> > pasta now.
>
> So, back from speed-
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 02:09:39 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 14:03, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> >> Booted with "rd.auto=1" and now I also get a funny start job
> >> running/waiting for /dev/sda1 (/ on the SSD).
> >>
> >> Oh my!
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:17:37 AM Todd Goodman wrote:
> FWIW, I have a similar problem with mdadm and dracut and do something
> similarly to what's described in:
>
> http://rich0gentoo.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/a-quick-dracut-module/
After more than 2 years still necessary to do it like tha
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 02:43:39 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 14:17, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> >> (Don't ask for the strange setup with sdb3/sdc6 and sdb6/sdc3,
> >> historically grown somehow ...)
> >
> > Seen stranger, it works.
> &
On 3 May 2014 15:46:07 CEST, "Canek Peláez Valdés" wrote:
>On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:37 AM, J. Roeleveld
>wrote:
>[snip]
>> Sounds like an issue with the mdadm script/unit.
>> Where is Canek with his knowledge of systemd?
>
>Canek was sleeping because
On 3 May 2014 15:48:03 CEST, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 03.05.2014 15:46, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:37 AM, J. Roeleveld
>wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Sounds like an issue with the mdadm script/unit.
>>> Where is Canek w
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 01:30:43 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
> wrote: [...]
>
> > Let me try to update this test VM to see if I can hit the same issue as
> > you.
> Total: 124 packages (107 upgrades, 1 downgrade, 5 new, 2 in new slots,
>
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 06:09:21 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 03 May 2014 14:17:53 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > With genkernel, I have a lvm and mdadm boot parameter.
> > With dracut, that might also be necessary.
> >
> > I would prefer the initramfs to do it
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 02:38:08 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 14:19, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > On Saturday, May 03, 2014 02:09:39 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >>> Pasta, which kind?
> >>
> >> Plain spaghetti with veggie sugo ... n
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:37:49 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> > sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r1:2
> > sys-kernel/dracut-033:0
> > sys-apps/systemd-204:0
> > sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.100-r2:0
>
> great, thanks
>
> I am able to boot a kernel 3.13.4 with
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:51:14 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.05.2014 20:47, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > On Saturday, May 03, 2014 08:37:49 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> Am 03.05.2014 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> >>> sys-boot/grub-2.00_p510
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:53:35 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 03 May 2014 23:04:49 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > I spent nearly the whole day digging around this issue ...
>
> You did better than I did recently: I spent four days at it.
For mission-critical systems, I would have done
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 11:15:22 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Do I have to change things because it's better that way, is it worth the
> effort ... ? Should I go away from RAID because LVM could stripe/mirror
> by itself? Should I go away from LVM because it's kinda old technology?
> ... all th
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 03:07:28 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2014 12:49, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > I wouldn't use the stripe/mirror support in LVM as I don't think it is
> > used
> > often and I feel that functionality doesn't belong in LVM.
&
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 02:22:16 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 04 May 2014 12:37:02 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:53:35 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Saturday 03 May 2014 23:04:49 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > > > I spent nearly the
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 01:15:51 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 03 May 2014 20:40:47 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > * SystemRescueCD and the Gentoo minimal installation CD both start
> > > any raid arrays they find and apply their own names to them. It is
> >
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 01:47:08 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 28 Apr 2014 13:32:05 I wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 13:57:19 I wrote:
> > > So far I've done these things:
> > >
> > > 1. Wiped the whole system and restored from backup (heavy overkill, but
> > > I
> > > wanted everyth
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:03:08 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2014 20:40, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > On Sunday, May 04, 2014 03:07:28 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> Oh, yes, I like ZFS and its features and used it in some cases already.
> >> But I didn
On Monday, May 05, 2014 08:10:55 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2014 21:22, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:03:08 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> People run KVM-hosts with storage on ZFS ... nice with the
> >> snapshots etc ...
> &
On Monday, May 05, 2014 08:14:07 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 04.05.2014 22:09, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> > It was far simpler than that and did not involve copying data. You
> > can change the hostname using one of the mdadm management commands
> > AFAIR (I meant man mdadm not man lvm of cou
On Monday, May 05, 2014 08:52:08 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Monday, May 05, 2014 08:10:55 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Am 04.05.2014 21:22, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > > On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:03:08 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > >> People run KVM-host
On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:48:50 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 05.05.2014 09:09, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > Update:
> > I just found the following page (didn't show up last year using Google):
> > http://redes-privadas-virtuales.blogspot.nl/2011/03/taking-
On Monday, May 05, 2014 01:25:52 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 05.05.2014 11:14, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> > That will take some time. Earliest moment I might have the time would be
> > June as I need to find a decent howto on setting up KVM along with
> > libvirt on a t
On 5 May 2014 16:12:43 CEST, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>Am 05.05.2014 14:27, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>> On Monday, May 05, 2014 01:25:52 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Am 05.05.2014 11:14, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>>>> That will take some time. Earlies
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 02:31:08 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> I'm trying to set up USB-key-encryption for use with a laptop. I'm
> running mdev instead of udev on the laptop, so lvm doesn't work.
I find this strange, as LVM can manage the /dev-entries directly.
On my systems, this is necessary as u
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 08:45:01PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote
>
> > On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 02:31:08 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > I'm trying to set up USB-key-encryption for use with a laptop. I'm
>
On 7 May 2014 20:11:10 CEST, Walter Dnes wrote:
>On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:11:02AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote
>> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, mdev != udev. People running RAID have problems
>too.
>>
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 02:36:29 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2014 20:57:29 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 7 May 2014 20:11:10 CEST, Walter Dnes
> >
> > wrote:
> > >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:11:02AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote
> > >
>
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 05:08:17 PM Zoltán Kócsi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Gentoo and I have a blocking issue which I don't
> really understand.
>
> I want to install some packages with docs but emerge tells me that it
> can't do that. Quite interestingly it complains about blocked pac
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 04:54:45 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. I am having a strange problem running under systemd since Monday.
> I use logwatch to get nice summaries of things going on in the system,
> it gives me once a day summaries of such things. When running under
> openrc, I use
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:11:02 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, wrote:
> > I run a script that syncs portage, updates @world, depcleans,
> > revdep-rebuild and finally runs dispatch-conf -- about once weekly. Keeps
> > my system in fine trim. :)
>
> This one is a g
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 08:31:12 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 22, 2014 04:54:45 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > Hi. I am having a strange problem running under systemd since Monday.
> > > I use logwatch to get nic
On Friday, May 16, 2014 01:12:52 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2014 22:29:46 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > I have this weird problem where a filesystem (Ext4) refuses to mount
> > automatically after something like a power loss or forced shutdown.
> >
> > The fstab entry for it is:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 05:20:56 PM Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Hi all. I enabled the ios use flag in make.conf, but what is the
> proper proceedure to mount the device so I can bring over my music? I
> am using Gnome; I'd imagine I'd have to emerge some kind of extension
> for nautilus. The device in
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:11:22 AM Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 05/26/2014 03:44 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> If you dual-boot Windows 7 or earlier and want to use that unsupported
> method mentioned above:
>
> 3) In Windows, in the registry key
> "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSe
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:57:58 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 27.05.2014 09:59, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> > So far, btrfs looks good on my laptop - time to think about putting
> > it on my desktop.
>
> Yeah, good luck with that. I am quite happy with btrfs so far ... no
> problems or disadv
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:31:26 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:09 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I am still happily using LVM with snapshots. Those are instantaneous as
> > well and I can then backup the snapshot, which on my server takes between
> > 2 ho
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 05:12:50 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:31:26 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:09 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Forgot to add:
For fileservers, I am starting to feel that ZFS or BTRFS snapshots are easier
to work with as
On Monday, June 02, 2014 11:56:24 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log
> > out but leave my computer on, leave home, some crook/NSA type breaks in
> > and tries to access something or s
On Monday, June 02, 2014 12:10:38 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:04:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > That said, my UPS claims it will run for about a hour or so. They could
> > go quite a ways around here in a hour.
>
> Mine won't last that long, but it does make quite a racket when yo
On Monday, June 02, 2014 07:28:53 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log
> >> out but leave my computer on, leave home, some croo
On Monday, June 02, 2014 03:23:03 PM Matti Nykyri wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 16:40, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Monday, June 02, 2014 07:28:53 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 02 Jun 201
On Monday, June 02, 2014 04:23:07 PM Matti Nykyri wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 17:52, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Monday, June 02, 2014 03:23:03 PM Matti Nykyri wrote:
> >> On Jun 2, 2014, at 16:40, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> >>> On Monday, June
On Monday, June 02, 2014 07:14:27 PM Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 02.06.2014 13:28, schrieb Rich Freeman:
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>> The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly.
> So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update
> sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be pulled in as a
> dependency
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:39:39 AM Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:30:11 +
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
> > now.
>
> Which is a lot better than to have it break by the l
It is marked stable. Otherwise it wouldn't cause blockers because it attempts
to force an installation of systemd.
--
Joost
On 3 June 2014 12:06:26 CEST, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:48:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> Then the dependencies should have be
1101 - 1200 of 1669 matches
Mail list logo
