[gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Hmm, "Not commonly used", don't know. First versions of autofs date back to > April 97, amd is much older, I think. So no, automounting is NOT new in > Linux, > it's there for over a decade now. At nearly 70, I can call a decade `fairly recent'. I have to beg to diff

[gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Hi, > > I really wonder about this discussion. "This tool can do it, that >tool can do it, the other one, too". WTF? No problem, don't read it. > Just mount the damn share and _EVERY_ tool can access it. So what? Settle down bub... you're not in a barroom here. Ease u

[gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Am Samstag 03 Oktober 2009 17:31:28 schrieb Harry Putnam: >> `eix midnight' fails as does `eix commander' >> >> Does it have a different name in portage? > > No, it has the same name as everywhere: mc ;-) Dirk, Your wisacre additi

[gentoo-user] Re: about layman and eix search

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Roy Wright writes: > update-eix-remote is an executable, not an option to the eix > executable. After running update-eix-remote your normal eix queries > will include overlays. Ha.. no wonder I didn't find it. However its not a part of the eix package nor is it visible on portage. At least

[gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: [...] >> Nifty, I didn't know that. Amazing what mc can do. Couple of points > that are not obvious in case Harry wants to try mc: it needs to be > compiled with the samba USE flag set; and you access your samba shares > using the "Right" or "Left" dropdown menus at the top of

[gentoo-user] Re: about layman and eix search

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman writes: [...] >> It must be common task for people using overlays... so anyone know how >> its done. > > Hi, > > Create the file /etc/eix-sync.conf with this one character in it: > * > > Then you can simply run eix-sync to automatically sync your overlays, > main portage tree, and u

[gentoo-user] Re: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Walker writes: >> Linux is much older than 1997... >> Not at all. [...] I really meant unix... where most of linux cmds and base tools comes from. But as people do unix/linux is often thought of as one kind of thing. [...] > Hmm. Most of the people who used (actually, played with becau

[gentoo-user] About layman... and the color output

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
New to layman but after at least a semi-careful look thru man layman I don't find anything explaining what the different color asterisks mean. I didn't read every word but scanned the whole thing twice and did a few searchs like /color and /output But those didn't do much good. Anyone know what

[gentoo-user] Re: OT: Linux as a first platform? Was: Abut smb:// aware tools

2009-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Stroller writes: > In separate posts, Harry Putnam wrote: >> I started my computer life on linux 1996.. only moved to windows for >> some things when editing video (I like the adobe tools... and linux >> just doesn't have anything remotely comparable.) >> ... >

[gentoo-user] Re: Fed up with Xorg + hal mess [SOLVED]

2009-10-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Dale writes: > I also know the SysReq key trick now. It can take you back to a console. I'll bite ... what is it?

[gentoo-user] Re: Fed up with Xorg + hal mess [SOLVED]

2009-10-08 Thread Harry Putnam
Alex Schuster writes: >> I'm curious about the actual key strokes. Is it >> >> Alt-SysRq and then REISUB And what is `SysRq' a reference to on a keyboard?

[gentoo-user] Re: commands to show where a package is installed?

2009-10-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Zhengquan Zhang writes: > 2009/10/9 Justin : >> Zhengquan Zhang wrote: >>> Hi, Gentoo users, >>> I am new to gentoo and am wondering if there is a command to show >>> where a package is installed? which file is installed in which >>> directory? >>> >>> Thanks a lot, >>> >> emerge app-portage/port

[gentoo-user] Re: commands to show where a package is installed?

2009-10-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Dale writes: > Zhengquan Zhang wrote: >> Hi, Gentoo users, >> I am new to gentoo and am wondering if there is a command to show >> where a package is installed? which file is installed in which >> directory? >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> > > I'm not sure this is what you are talking about but this

[gentoo-user] [OT Xfce4/KDE] A URL aware applet

2009-10-17 Thread Harry Putnam
I once was a KDE desktop user... Lasted quite a while. But over time I went to Xfce4 Been using it now a good while, but one applet from KDE is sorely missed. There was some kind of panel applet, that was URL aware. Any time you highlighted text that looked like some kind of URL, a dialog

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT Xfce4/KDE] A URL aware applet

2009-10-18 Thread Harry Putnam
Keith Dart writes: > Then, whenever I know I have some url selected (I don't need an applet > to tell me) I just have to press the key combination and off it > goes. :-) Thanks for the input and example. The applet I'm remembering was very unobtrusive... the one recommended here by hp_sebastian.

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT Xfce4/KDE] A URL aware applet

2009-10-18 Thread Harry Putnam
hp_sebastian writes: > > xfce-extra/xfce4-clipman-plugin Thank, that looks pretty flexible.

[gentoo-user] emerge advises upgrade profile

2009-10-26 Thread Harry Putnam
My profile has been ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 starting an update system today I'm told my profile is depricated and to update to default/linux/x86/10.0 I've forgotten about how this is done. Is it just a matter of ln -sf /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/10

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge advises upgrade profile

2009-10-26 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: >> [1] default/linux/x86/10.0 * >> [2] default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop >> [3] default/linux/x86/10.0/developer >> [4] default/linux/x86/10.0/server >> [5] hardened/linux/x86/10.0 >> [6] selinux/2007.0/x86 >> [7] selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened >> [8]

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge advises upgrade profile

2009-10-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Jonathan Callen writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: >> In fact what does `developer' buy you? > > Among other things, it enables I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING, which tells you > the expected audience :). Seriously, the developer profiles are mainly > for Gentoo Devs, people who a

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge advises upgrade profile

2009-10-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: >> Alan, what does it get you? In fact what does `developer' buy you? > > x86/10.0 gives you a baseline for that release > x86/10.0/desktop|developer|server give you a profile more suited (tweaked) > for > that kind of usage. [...] Nice.. thanks I see I already have mos

[gentoo-user] Re: public mail server for ELOG?

2009-10-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Grant writes: [...] > > So I need a relay somewhere along with ssmtp to get a message to an > email address? Yes, and I know of at least one that will work for you. If you have a newsguy mail account, newsguy's smtp servers will allow you to connect regardless of your laptops' outward IP. (unl

[gentoo-user] video capture from min-dv... kernel params

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
My windowsXP video editing machine where I use various adobe tools to capture and edit video, has lost use of the ohci ports, and seemingly the usb ports as well. I've been seeing problems with those inputs for a while and today, finally the machine simply is not `seeing' the video cam attached to

[gentoo-user] Kernel upgrading and linux symlink

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Looking at the kernel upgrade pages at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kernel-upgrade.xml Its a bit confusing about the symlink creation. I've wondered about it a few times. At the top, you're told how to get the sources and then a discussion of the symlink follows. It appears you are expected

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrading and linux symlink

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > The link is created only if you have the "symlink" USE flag enabled. > > Also, "Gentoo requires that the [...] symbolic link points to the > sources of the kernel you are running" is not entirely correct. It is > required only when you want to build something against

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrading and linux symlink

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: > Nikos is being kind to the document writers :-) Thanks for saving me from the Dunce cap...hehe. But I might yet acquire full rights to it.. So, is the symlink not really necessary? Doe something look at /usr/src/linux for files? For example, if you cd 'ed into the sou

[gentoo-user] More about hal

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
When I noticed the thread here about `hal' that started a while back it caused me enough curiousity that i ran eix -Ic ^hal$ but found I have no `hal' installed. I have keep up with updates somewhat better than usual the last few months but don't remember when hal went away... I do remember having

[gentoo-user] libsxlt and aclocal/autoconf failing during emerge

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Can anyone tell from the tail of emerge -vuD system what the trouble is with aclocal/autoconf and libxslt. First it failed on aclocal... I re-emerged emerge -v sys-devel/aclocal-wrapper Tried again and it failed on autoconf emerge -v sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper But that didn't help it ... st

[gentoo-user] Re: libsxlt and aclocal/autoconf failing during emerge

2009-10-31 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: > On 10/31/2009 06:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Can anyone tell from the tail of emerge -vuD system >> what the trouble is with aclocal/autoconf and libxslt. >> ... >> * Failed Running autoconf ! >> * >> * Include in your bugreport the co

[gentoo-user] Re: libsxlt and aclocal/autoconf failing during emerge

2009-11-01 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: > On 10/31/2009 07:05 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> ... >> /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.26/temp/autoconf.out >> * autoconf * >> * PWD: /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.26/work/libxslt-1.1.26 >> * autoconf >>

[gentoo-user] When masked pkg not in [...]profiles/package.mask, where is it

2009-11-01 Thread Harry Putnam
When a package comes up as masked in an eix search, they are usually found in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask, but if a particular masked package is not listed there... where else would it be. I see libtool is masked above version 1.5.26-r1, but is not in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask...

[gentoo-user] Re: When masked pkg not in [...]profiles/package.mask, where is it

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: > failing that, look in /etc/portage/package.mask* Sure enough... I masked it.. but like Dick Cheney, I don't recall it. Ahh the joys of senility

[gentoo-user] Re: libsxlt and aclocal/autoconf failing during emerge

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Marc Joliet writes: > Wait, but those are small 'm's. That means they must have been masked > manually. As Alan McKinnon mentioned in your other thread ("When masked pkg > not > in [...]profiles/package.mask, where is it"), you might have an entry > in /etc/portage/package.mask. My god... I'm r

[gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild vs. @preserved-rebuild

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: > You read the message, run @preserved-rebuild and x now links to the new y > library. When everything in @preserved-rebuild has been rebuilt, portage > knows > that now nothing links to the old y library, and removes it. Alan, I haven't followed the introduction of @pre

[gentoo-user] new version of gcc

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
I noticed I've been masking gcc beyond version 4.3.2-r3, and have forgotten why I had it masked. I'm updating world right now, and wondered if I were to move up to most recent gcc (4.4.2), which would be a 5 version jump, what I could expect in the way of problems. Would I need to re-emerge just

[gentoo-user] Re: new version of gcc

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: Harry asked: >> Would I need to re-emerge just about everything? >> > Volker answered: > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gentoo+gcc+upgrade+guide&l=1 Quoted from http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml , | To be completely safe that your system is in a sane state

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: > your drivers for the ide disks have to be built INTO THE KERNEL! NOT MODULES. Is that really a hard rule? I've done it both ways successfully in the past. And in fact, I didn't record my first builds on this kernel but I'm pretty sure my first build did have all P

[gentoo-user] Re: new version of gcc

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:03:24 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Turns out I have bigger problems. ( I didn't upgrade gcc) but the >> things I did upgrad in upgrade system followed by upgrade world. Have >> messed up mouse and keyboard in X

[gentoo-user] kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
I'll say right from the start, that building a new kernel, has always been a problem for me. I don't remember ever not having a problem, in 10+ yrs.. Many people here seem to find it completely easy... not me. So I'm back in the soup. [I hope what I try to layout below is not overly confusing]

[gentoo-user] Re: new version of gcc

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
Nice... good advice all around. Thanks posters. Turns out I have bigger problems. ( I didn't upgrade gcc) but the things I did upgrad in upgrade system followed by upgrade world. Have messed up mouse and keyboard in X. But even that, is a lesser problem than my kernel build ends up in a kernel

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: > There's no reason to use menuconfig after running oldconfig, If your > old kernel was using all of the hardware, then the new kernel should, > too, just with oldconfig. I don't know about that. I found a whole lot of stuff different when I ran menuconfig and checked the old and

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-03 Thread Harry Putnam
hamilton writes: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:02:18 -0800, walt wrote: >> On 11/03/2009 02:29 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >>> I'll say right from the start, that building a new kernel, has always >>> been a problem for me. I don't remember ever not having a pr

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
"John H. Moe" writes: > I stopped using that option in my systems, as there is now a AHCI SATA > option to use instead. It appears CONFIG_ATA_SFF (which CONFIG_ATA_PIIX > requires) is deprecated. From the help on it: Do you notice some kind of difference from switching?

[gentoo-user] fsck date problem during boot

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
I've been fiddling with a new kernel, and have had several occasions to reboot lately. If I mounted /boot to cp the new kernel etc over, I have a problem on reboot for sure. Somehow the date of last fsck on /boot is seen as `in the future' so fsck fails on /dev/had1 (/boot). Which means nearly a

[gentoo-user] Another angle on hal/xorg thread

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
I didn't want to derail the ongoing thread about hal/xorg with this question there. Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but at some point hal disappeared. And is not on my system anymore. I've always used and /etc/X11/xorg.conf file for starting X. What I'm wonderin

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Mike Edenfield writes: > The 'make' man page wouldn't know anything about the kernel's > makefile. You want the README file that's included in the top of the > kernel source folder. That file says, among other things: > > "make oldconfig" Default all questions based on the contents of >

[gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Alex Schuster writes: > Strange. Is hal still in your USE flags? > It is not really neded, but I think it's nice to have - maybe not for > x.org, but for other things like automounting devices. Here's the list of > my packages that need HAL: I didn't tell quite all of it. Hal was not in my us

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
"Dirk Heinrichs" writes: > If it still won't work, you can also post your kernel config and the output > of > lspci -vv here and somebody will find out what's wrong/missing. Good input thanks. I did get it working. It was an IDE selection I missed. >From the lspci -vv you mentioned (aggrav

[gentoo-user] Re: fsck date problem during boot

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Stroller writes: > On 4 Nov 2009, at 15:45, Harry Putnam wrote: >> ... >> Somehow the date of last fsck on /boot is seen as `in the future' so >> fsck fails on /dev/had1 (/boot). > > The first thing I would want to check is the motherboard battery. Is >

[gentoo-user] [OT] Homebuilt Mobo bundles

2009-11-05 Thread Harry Putnam
ust a fake come-on and the price is like that all over. Is there anyone here who is willing to correspond with me privately about this project? Maybe someone who can vouch for some of the more recent equipment out there. Since gmane obfuscates the email address on From line here it is: Harry Pu

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Homebuilt Mobo bundles

2009-11-05 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: > One caution there -- newer computer hardware demands a great deal of > power, and older power supplies may not be up to the task. Don't try > to squeak by with a wimpy power supply. > >> >> I thought maybe a mobo bundle would be a good starting place... > > I've been building my o

[gentoo-user] Re: kernel build - back in the soup.

2009-11-07 Thread Harry Putnam
daid kahl writes: > 2009/11/4 Harry Putnam : >> I'll say right from the start, that building a new kernel, has always >> been a problem for me.  I don't remember ever not having a problem, in >> 10+ yrs.. >> >> Many people here seem to find it compl

[gentoo-user] Re: decrapify your kernel config WAS: ps shows pegasus process running - what is it?

2009-11-08 Thread Harry Putnam
Stroller writes: > Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I > could be spending reading a good book, instead [1]. > Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this thread. I'm with you Stroller. Although I do have to admit and should admit since I'm

[gentoo-user] Re: decrapify your kernel config WAS: ps shows pegasus process running - what is it?

2009-11-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: > configuring is easy. > > enable the hardware you have. > disable the hardware you don't have. > read the help to all options that are default on - do you really need it? > Really? > read the help to all options that are off but might be usefull for you. > change wh

[gentoo-user] OS inaccessable after brief uptime in X

2009-11-28 Thread Harry Putnam
I keep having a problem where the OS becomes inaccessable after running in X for a while. I haven't noticed a time pattern yet but it doesn't take long sometimes. Today I started from an OFF machine, booted up, started X did a few things A few minutes later I attempted to login via ssh from a re

[gentoo-user] How to determine which mobo without opening case

2009-11-29 Thread Harry Putnam
How can I determine the motherboard make and model? I mean without opening the case. Various hardware reporting tools such as uhinv and syscriptor do not give that information (far as I can tell). In fact syscriptor cannot even report pci info and gives the message `cannot open /proc/pci' (n

[gentoo-user] Re: How to determine which mobo without opening case

2009-11-30 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:37:49 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> How can I determine the motherboard make and model? I mean without >> opening the case. > > sys-apps/lshw Good call Neil, I found that tool shortly after posting. It gives as good as d

[gentoo-user] Re: How to determine which mobo without opening case

2009-11-30 Thread Harry Putnam
Dan Cowsill writes: > > As a matter of curiosity, why can't you open the case? Aside from extreme laziness, I'd prefer to spend 2 seconds getting the info than first pulling the machine out of some piled up mess of several machines, then getting my beat up old body into some contorted position w

[gentoo-user] Re: How to determine which mobo without opening case

2009-12-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Marcus Wanner writes: > On 11/30/2009 9:13 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Dan Cowsill writes: >> >> >>> As a matter of curiosity, why can't you open the case? >>> >> >> Aside from extreme laziness, I'd prefer to spend 2 seconds g

[gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q]

2009-12-20 Thread Harry Putnam
Can anyone show me how to write a logrotate rule that will rotate on either size or age? I use some very simple scripting for yrs but don't really see how to rotate on more than one condition. I'd like to rotate a certain log weekly or over 7000k and keep no more than 12 rotations for whatever re

[gentoo-user] [OT apache] No cgi scripts work now

2009-12-22 Thread Harry Putnam
This machine was my local lan httpd server, but then I switched that functionality to an opensolaris machine... due to problems with a recent osol build I switched back temporarily. Meantime I must have allowed a new config to get setup ... maybe thru careless allowing of new conf files. Whatever

[gentoo-user] Re: rsync reverts to old file versions

2010-01-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Grant writes: > rsync -vr --inplace --delete /path/to/music/ gr...@192.168.1.2:/path/to/music what OSs' are the hosts? I've had that happen a time or two when the source host was a windows machine, having something to do with the way windows handles permissions and dates. The windows files wer

[gentoo-user] [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-01 Thread Harry Putnam
I want to encrypt a directory heirarchy on a remote machine where I don't have root. I can use either an openbsd, or gentoo remote.

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-02 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:32:07 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> I want to encrypt a directory heirarchy on a remote machine where I >> don't have root. I can use either an openbsd, or gentoo remote. > > Provided the kernel has ecrypt support an

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-05 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:12:29 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> I have an encfs encrpted partition on my home machine.. However I want >> a back up offsite. >> >> The encrypted partition would be mounted, the contents tarred/gzipped, >

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-06 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:09:03 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> > Why not just tar up the underlying encfs partition? The data >> > is already encrypted, what's the point of decrypting it to encrypt it >> > again? That way you don't

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-14 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:27:32 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> > Then use rsync instead of tar, then you can mount the remote >> > filesystem using sshfs and encfs to read individual files. It's a >> > little slow as you are laye

[gentoo-user] Freeze up during X session

2010-01-14 Thread Harry Putnam
I'm experiencing a problem where during an X session the machine inexplicably freezes up... networking along with mouse keyboard etc. No access is then possible via ssh or any other way other than a hard reboot. I've attempted to debug the problem by first searching the logs. But not finding any

[gentoo-user] Re: Freeze up during X session

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Helmut Jarausch writes: > To "exclude" a software problem, try booting from a > SystemRescue-CD > http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page > > It's Gentoo based and sports an X-Server. Thanks for the recue disk tip. > That are the problems that makes one crazy! Well put... hehe. But I chickened ou

[gentoo-user] What xorg pkgs needed for X to work

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Sorry for the awkwardly phrased subject... but couldn't think of anything better. I'm rebuilding my home desktop with a full reinstall So far haven't gotten to getting X working... but did notice that when I test what all gets installed with: emerge -vp xfce4-meta I notice that xorg-x11 is no

[gentoo-user] Re: file system failure after emerge -DuN @system

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Helmut Jarausch writes: >>> Does the machine run well enough that you can reinstall both glibc >>> and udev again? >> >> Not right now. After the boot complains that the super block isn't >> right the disk is getting mounted read only. I cannot even edit a file >> with vi. > > Try booting by usi

[gentoo-user] What xorg pkgs needed for X to work

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
[Please excuse if this is a double whammy... it appears not to have made it to the mail/news server] Sorry for the awkwardly phrased subject... but couldn't think of anything better. I'm rebuilding my home desktop with a full reinstall So far haven't gotten to getting X working... but did notice

[gentoo-user] Re: What xorg pkgs needed for X to work

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > On Friday 15 January 2010 20:43:32 Harry Putnam wrote: > > [Please excuse if this is a double whammy... it appears not to have > > made it to the mail/news server] > > > > Sorry for the awkwardly phrased subject... but coul

[gentoo-user] What role does dev-libs/boost play with encfs?

2010-01-15 Thread Harry Putnam
I'm probably way behind the eightball asking something like this, but I'm wondering what role `dev-libs/boost' plays with encfs. The home page indicates its something of a helper application for using cpp++ programming language and applications. The reason I ask is that it appears to be up there

[gentoo-user] Re: What role does dev-libs/boost play with encfs?

2010-01-16 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins writes: > If you *really* want to know what encfs uses Boost for you could, of > course, examine the source :) But you really only need to know that > it's a big C++ library that's used by encfs. > > Go grab a coffee or do a load of laundry or something. Good idea... thanks .. :)

[gentoo-user] Accesssing gentoo repostitories

2010-01-16 Thread Harry Putnam
In the course of a full reinstall I've run into several packages that appear not to be findable... watching emerge race all over the glob looking for certain packages...there seems to be some problem with what portage is looking for and pushing those packages out to repos. I've already forgotten t

[gentoo-user] Re: Accesssing gentoo repostitories

2010-01-16 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam writes: > In the course of a full reinstall I've run into several packages that > appear not to be findable... watching emerge race all over the glob > looking for certain packages...there seems to be some problem with > what portage is looking for and pushing thos

[gentoo-user] About the change from /etc/X11/xorg.conf

2010-01-16 Thread Harry Putnam
I hadn't done a full reinstall for a good while, long enough that I missed out on whateve was said about the change over from using /etc/X11/xorg.conf to control the X display to whatever does it now. So my first question is what does do it?.. I have a nice desktop but no /etc/X11/xorg.conf. Howe

[gentoo-user] Re: About the change from /etc/X11/xorg.conf

2010-01-17 Thread Harry Putnam
pk writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: > >> So, where would I make such a setting in the new arrangement?... I >> suspect I could force a return to xorg.conf... but would sooner >> understand how to utilize the new proceedure. > > xorg.conf still works fine with the lates

[gentoo-user] Re: About the change from /etc/X11/xorg.conf

2010-01-18 Thread Harry Putnam
walt writes: > On 01/16/2010 01:32 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> I hadn't done a full reinstall for a good while, long enough that I >> missed out on whateve was said about the change over from using >> /etc/X11/xorg.conf to control the X display to whatever does it now.

[gentoo-user] Re: About the change from /etc/X11/xorg.conf

2010-01-18 Thread Harry Putnam
pk writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: > >> For now, with hal, with dbus, assuming no xorg.conf... where are >> custom settings regarding the X session done? > > Under /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/... or you could continue to use the old > xorg.conf since that will override what&#x

[gentoo-user] [OT] Something like Webresearch for linux

2010-01-18 Thread Harry Putnam
I wondered if anyone here knows of a linux tool that is similar to webresearch: http://www.macropool.de/en/products/webresearch/index.html Its one of those clip and save from the internet (or whole pages) kind of things that allows you to make a hierarchy of folders and has some useful search c

[gentoo-user] Re: Smart Database

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Jon Hardcastle writes: > Hi guys, > > I want to update my gentoo install to use the latest trunk version > of the smartmontools drive database. > > Does anyone have any gentoo orientated guidance here? I have spoken > to the chaps there and they say to run configure with > '--enable-drivedb' and

[gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Peter Humphrey writes: > On Tuesday 19 January 2010 09:03:57 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:21:18 -0600, Dale wrote: >> > I usually just do softlevel=single or that other one I got wrote down >> > here somewhere. >> >> That turns off almost everything, whereas gentoo=nox does a n

[gentoo-user] Re: Smart Database

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Jon Hardcastle writes: > Thanks for your input! Wow that is alot more complicated that I had > hoped! > > I am already using the masked version of Smartmontools but the 5.39 > version does not include 1 of the HDD I use and as I have got a > whole load more of that exact model of drive on the way

[gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Peter Humphrey writes: > See? I don't have to remember any options, I just key up or down to the > config I want. Easy. Nice... thanks

[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

2010-02-03 Thread Harry Putnam
After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another revdep-rebuild and it finds the same thing. Anyone seen something similar or have an idea what might be the problem?

[gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

2010-02-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: > On Wednesday 03 February 2010 23:45:00 Harry Putnam wrote: >> After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils >> broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another >> revdep-rebuild and it finds the same

[gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

2010-02-05 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:13:20 +0800, Leon Feng wrote: > >> I have seen this for weeks, but since I upgrade to portage-2.2* at the >> same time, do not know whether it is related. My revdep-rebuild out is >> listed below, anyone has a solution? > > Are you also running the te

[gentoo-user] Re: binutils broken revdep-rebuild

2010-02-05 Thread Harry Putnam
Mariusz Ceier writes: >> But if I am reading revdep-rebuild output correctly, it means that >> your binutils is compiled to be linked against that library. But the >> library cannot be found by revdep-rebuild. Hence the error. >> >> W > libiberty.a comes from binutils. > Looking at Stefan revde

[gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild keeps reinstalling binutils

2010-02-06 Thread Harry Putnam
Leon Feng writes: [...] >> I'm running ~x86 on everything and latest version of gentoolkit (I >> don't have gentoolkit-dev installed) >> >> I've emerged lafilefixer (thanks Steve) and ran >>lafilefixer --justfixit >> >> Then ran revdep-rebuild again it still finds broken binutils so >

[gentoo-user] When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-30 Thread Harry Putnam
I want to install emacs-w3m. I have already built an emacs install by hand from cvs emacs tar ball. I always build emacs myself. Running emerge -v -p emacs-w3m shows: These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] app-editors/emacs-21.4 +

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided > Where to look to learn about the required syntax? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I want to install emacs-w3m. I have already built an emacs install by >> hand from cvs emacs tar ball. I always build emacs myself. > [snip] >> Emerge wants to inst

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While it would mean re-installing emacs, you could use the emacs-cvs > ebuild which builds emacs from cvs head. To keep up-to-date you just > have to re-emerge and you will build with the latest changes. How can I get a look at what and how stuff gets i

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While it would mean re-installing emacs, you could use the emacs-cvs > ebuild which builds emacs from cvs head. To keep up-to-date you just > have to re-emerge and you will build with the latest changes. Sorry to hammer on this so much... I haven't been

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 31 May 2005 22:22:29 -0500 > Harry Putnam wrote: > >> An >> example might be that if emacs isn't installed at /usr/local its >> already outside the standard emacs install. > > and you have moved outside t

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided And if no `profile' directory exists, is that something one creates or is it put there by some package? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided > > Regards, > Jason Stubbs Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > man portage > > Specifically for the package.provided file it wants the package and > version that you have installed outside o

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided >> > >> >> Where to look to learn about the required syntax? >> > > man portage > > Specifically for the package.provided file it wants the package and > version that you have installed outside of portage. For ex

[gentoo-user] Re: When a dependancy built by hand

2005-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > man portage > > Specifically for the package.provided file it wants the package and > version that you have installed outside of portage. For example: If you > have downloaded and installed your own kernel from kernel.org, placing > > sys-kernel/vanilla-

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >