On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> On Dec 26, 2012 1:05 AM, "Canek Peláez Valdés" wrote:
>
> {supersnip}
> Canek, I distinctly remember, at the very beginning of this brouhaha over
> udev requiring /usr to be mounted at boot time, you stated so
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[ snip ]
> I'm sorry if sounded like scoffing (certainly I don't remember
> scoffing anyone, at least consciously). I remember I praised Walt for
> doing the work for mdev. Do you remember that? I can dig the archive
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, pk wrote:
> On 2012-12-27 02:14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> I really think that's the crux of the matter Pandou: udev/systemd
>> serves to the wants of the many. The eudev fork serves to the wants of
>
> systemd+udev serves the
> make the output colourful. The gentoo sshd script is actually simple
> too and doesn't do anything most of the time and is easily modifiable
> in absolutely predictable ways.
I'm not arguing that; I'm arguing that it can be done even more
simple, and even more easily modifiable.
But like a said to Pandou; let's just agree to disagree.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
uld get dumped and forgotten.
>
> Do you gentoo-users have any opinions on this?
>
> Does it make any sense to re-create my main user(-dir)?
I started over with a clean $HOME, and I moved back the non-GNOME
stuff (.ssh, .gnupg, .bash*, etc). But maybe it was overkill.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:15 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2012-12-28 00:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> Well, yeah, that's the point. I want to install Gentoo in my mother's
>> PC, and never have to go to her house because someting broke.
>
> I really don'
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:38:15 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> In SysV, I can *write* the daemon in the init script.
>> In *that* sense, the init system tells the daemon how to do things,
>
> Please
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2012 2:18 AM, "Canek Peláez Valdés" wrote:
>>
>> Stop thinking in sshd. I can write the *whole* daemon in shell, not in
>> another script file, but inside /etc/init.d/mystupiddaemon (or
>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:40 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2012-12-28 20:01, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> Because I prefer Gentoo?
>
> That's what I really don't understand! You say you don't want to care
> about the system which implies Fedora or any other install-a
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:14:46 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kevin Chadwick
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:38:15 -0600
>> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 28.12.2012 00:45, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> No, it works that way. You could changed in previous versions with the
>> /apps/metacity/general/mouse_button_modifier key in gconftool-2, but
>> now it
to eth3?
Check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. Probably the old
(fried) ethernet card is listed there (along with other stuff). Leave
out everything except your PCI card (the MAC address is how you tell
them appart).
Worst case, delete the file (after saving a copy), and see if ud
; udev does not re-create it. All is now fine with rc-status
> only showing net.eth0 which is set up how I like it
> per /etc/conf.d/net. All services are fine
>
>
> Move on, or hand edit the '70-persistent-net.rules' file?
I would move on. The idea is that everything "just works".
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
a kludge. One thing I notice is:
>
>
>
> # udevadm info -p /dev/mapper/vg00-rootfs -q all
>
> syspath not found
>
>
>
> Udev seems not to know about the LVs. Any ideas?
How did you create your initramfs? Have you tried dracut, with
DRACUT_MODULES="lvm"
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Friday 04 Jan 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Robin Atwood
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Having observed all the ranting, I thought I would try systemd on a
>> > laptop. It a
st when mounting it.)
Why is /tmp being mounted by fusermount? Can you show us yout fstab
/tmp entry? Mine looks like:
tmpfs /tmptmpfs defaults,nosuid,size=100%
0 0
It's mounted like this:
# mount|grep /tmp
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,rela
,
>>
>> --Kerin
>
> Very interesting info. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
I think the proper explanation is here:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
an 5 systemd.conf
man 1 systemd
If I recall correctly, that's it. systemd automatically will buffer
the early boot messages until your preferred syslog service start, and
from that point on it will send the logs to it immediately.
Hope it helps.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Robin Atwood
wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Robin Atwood
>> wrote:
>
>> > I have temporarily shelved my problem with mounting since my work-around
>
>
d systemd-197 also (which wasn't
yet in the tree yesterday), and I don't use LVM, but I'm wondering if
the LVM problem happens when you use an initramfs. I'm guessing it
doesn't, since udev should read rules from /lib/udev/rules.d AND
/usr/lib/udev/rules.d.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
"/lib/rules.d",
UDEVLIBEXECDIR "/rules.d",
NULL);
if (!rules->dirs) {
I thought Gentoo had a patch like that. It's necessary, since not
every package will install rules in /lib.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sascha Cunz wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> But it fixes how udev it's packaged in Gentoo, which is very good
>>> news. I haven't upgraded, since I need systemd
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sascha Cunz wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> But it fixes how udev it's packaged in Gentoo, whic
. I will not be surprised if
Gentoo makes systemd the recommended default before Ubuntu. And yet,
Ubuntu doesn't want to fork udev, and actually a Canonical employee
has git access to the udev/systemd tree.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Robin Atwood
wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Robin Atwood
>
>>
>
>> wrote:
>
>> > On Thursday 10 January 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>&
ib/rules.d",
UDEVLIBEXECDIR "/rules.d",
NULL);
/etc/udev/rules.d has always been the first dir scanned for rules
(which means the rules in /etc will override any other rule), and as
far as I know nobody has ever suggested to move or change that.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
ld appreciate any help.
The usual info is necessary: do you mean they stopped working on X? Do
you use a xorg.conf? Do you use xf86-input-evdev?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
8.663]GeForce GTX 400 (NVC0)
> [ 638.663] (--) using VT number 7
>
> [ 638.685] (II) [drm] nouveau interface version: 1.0.0
> [ 638.685] (EE) No devices detected.
> [ 638.685]
> Fatal server error:
> [ 638.685] no screens found
> [ 638.685] (EE)
> Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
> at http://wiki.x.org
> for help.
> [ 638.685] (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for
> additional information.
> [ 638.685] (EE)
>
>
> /etc/X11/xorg.conf
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "video"
> Driver "nouveau"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Extensions"
> Option "Composite" "Enable"
> EndSection
Since you are using the nouveau drivers, could you try to start up X
without an xorg.conf file? It should just work.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
make things more
clear, could you please post the output from "equery l -if
x11-drivers/", and also your kernel .config? Also, do you have
VIDEO_CARDS in /etc/portage/make.conf, and if so to which value?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Compu
dispatch-conf?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
gt;=sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2 required by
> (virtual/modutils-0::gentoo, installed)
>
> ---
>
> So how can I fix this mess? I masked sys-fs/udev-197-r3,
> now portage does not complain, but it is just temporary
> solution...
try:
emerge -Cv sys-apps/mo
n reinstall them and their
rules move to the right directory. The slow way is to look at the
files in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, do a "equery b ${file}", reinstall
that package, and repeat until /usr/lib/udev/rules.d is empty.
Hope it helps.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:12:23 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> Therefore, for all the programs that installed rules in
>> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d before the update, those rules cannot be found
>> for the new u
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, »Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:41:07 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jarry wrote:
>> > Hi Gentoo-users,
>> >
>> > I'm just in the process of updating my nearly identic
re built-in, like embedded ones.
Unless udev has no other means to load modules, I think disabling kmod
assumes then that all the modules are built-in. And if you use
modules, may I ask why you would prefer module-init-tools over kmod?
Specially when the later is a drop-in, better supported r
age). If you are using the same version for udev and
systemd, are you using an initramfs? When was the last time you built
it, if you do?
Could you boot with "systemd.log_target=kmsg" and
"systemd.log_level=debug", and post the whole output of "journalctl
-b"? It prints on
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list!
>>>
>>> Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM, João Matos wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/1/26 Canek Peláez Valdés
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 PM, João Matos wrote:
>> > Hi list,
>> >
>> > I'm having this problem for a while, but I've decided to solve
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 27.01.2013 22:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> udev-197 in the tree installs everything to /; systemd-197 installs to
>> /usr. I'm pretty sure that is not going to end well; I haven't
>>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 28.01.2013 20:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> I saw that mgorny unmasked systemd, and I'm installing it as of right
>> now. I hope to have no problems, but I still don't know how they
>>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 28.01.2013 20:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>>
>>> I saw that mgorny unmasked systemd, and I'm installing it as of right
>>>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 28.01.2013 20:34, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> My gdm USE-flags are:
>>
>> [ebuild R ~] gnome-base/gdm-3.6.2 USE="audit fallback gnome-shell
>> introspection ipv6 ldap plymouth systemd
ntedBy=multi-user.target
As I have been saying all this years: that systemd can work without
using scripts, doesn't mean that it isn't able to use them. I use a
couple of them myself; I think this is a perfect example of one. Your
unit file then it's small and simple, as all of them should be.
Remember that /usr/local/bin/kvm-brigdge needs to be executable.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>> wrote:
>>> Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>>
>>>>
failing, IMO. Don't use the bad practices from SysV/OpenRC in
systemd, I'm just saying.
Just my opinion. But great to know is working.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 29.01.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> I really believe the most important thing abount systemd unit files is
>> that they are small and simple. You can also check the exit status
>> from each c
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
>> certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
>> My
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> [...] but lets just agree to disagree [...]
Agreed.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
pam
> policykit selinux test KERNEL="linux"}
> Installed versions: 0.4.5_p20120320-r1(18:13:50 30.01.2013)(acl
> pam policykit -debug -doc -selinux -test KERNEL="linux")
>
> What exactly do you suggest now?
If you have -consolekit, why it's still i
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 18:52, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>> wrote:
>>> Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
>>>
>>>
llowing line in
/etc/pam.d/system-login?
-sessionoptional pam_systemd.so
Also, before you reboot, could you edit /etc/gdm/custom.conf and add
the following to the [debug] section?
Enable=true
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 19:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Everything looks fine. However, you did rebuild pambase, did you
>> rebooted your computer?
>
> Yes, I think so, but I am not sure right now.
> Will do
could also try to compile with &> to a log file, and
prepare a binary package instead of installing it immediately. The log
file actually could help to find the problem.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/3609
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
>> steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
>>
>
, your error is different, and one similar to one I had before:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363061
What does systemctl status accounts-daemon.service says? Actually,
could tell me what services are in red when you run "systemctl --full
--all"?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Am 30.01.2013 20:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>>
>>>> Put up the
ttp://lwn.net/Articles/531850/
[2]
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
n 30 20:14:16 hiro gdm-launch-environment][6116]:
AccountsService-DEBUG(+): ActUserManager: Found x11 display of session
'c11': :0
Jan 30 20:14:18 hiro gdm-launch-environment][6116]:
AccountsService-DEBUG(+): ActUserManager: Found x11 display of session
'c12': :0
Jan 30 20:14:18 hir
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 31.01.2013 19:06, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> I tries in the consoles c11, c12, and then on the c13 and 14.
>
> Yes, I noticed that trying-around as well ...
>
>> I don't
>> know wh
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 31.01.2013 19:26, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> And I suppose both sgw and gdm are in the video group (the later is
>> done by the ebuild, if I'm not mistaken).
>
> Yes, they are:
>
> # g
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>>> wrote:
> [snip]
>
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2013-01-31 19:54, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> sshd.service, ssh@.service, systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service, and
>> systemd-update-utmp-shutdown.service have auditd.service in their
>> After= fi
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2013-02-01 20:39, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Having an empty log is also weird; mine says:
>>
>> Jan 30 01:19:20 centurion polkitd[1614]: Started polkitd version 0.110
>> Jan 30 01:19:22 centurio
ection as I use "su" within my terminator-sessions very
> often.
>
> digging further.
What's the difference between the users stef and sgw? What do you mean
by "I use "su" within my terminator-sessions very often"?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
r what is worth, you also don't need to specify neither /dev nor
/proc in fstab with systemd. I'm not sure the init system has anything
to do with it, though; I believe is udev work, so with a recent
version of udev, no matter the init system (I think), /dev and /proc
are unnecessary (and perhaps even problematic) in /etc/fstab.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
enough to let systemd generate
> its relevant unit-files etc.
>
> Right?
I haven't used an encrypted swap (nor partition), but I believe that's
all you need. A workaround perhaps is to put the nofail option, which
at least will skip the partition when booting.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
m service depend on it (it would be
mounted at gdm startup, not at session startup, though).
> Thoughts? Experiences?
I have never used pam_mount; what's the upside? Just delaying the
mounting (and perhaps fsck'ing) of the partition until session login?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez
These options are pretty new, I think they went live after GNOME 3.6,
so I hope that with GNOME 3.8 we will be able to comment that line
again and everything will work automagically.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 10.02.2013 20:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Yep, had the same problem, solved with:
>>
>> LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
>>
>> in /etc/systemd/logind.conf. Since then it has happened again m
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.02.2013 22:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Do you have acpid installed/enabled? Anything aside the default
>>> acpi-scripts?
>
it;
we on the list can help you to get the keyworded version installed.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
o what package each rule belongs.
> I assume the problematic files (in the issue with encrypted swap) come
> from lvm2:
>
> # equery b 10-dm.rules
> * Searching for 10-dm.rules ...
> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.98 (/lib/udev/rules.d/10-dm.rules)
>
> # equery b 11-dm-lvm.rules
> * Searching for 11-dm-lvm.rules ...
> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.98 (/lib/udev/rules.d/11-dm-lvm.rules)
>
>
>
> I will unmerge lvm2 for now as I think I don't need it on the laptop (I
> don't use PVs/VGs/LVs here and that device-mapper-stuff happens
> elsewhere, correct?)
LVM2 will be pulled again by udisks2; it's a mandatory dependency. I
don't think the problem is related to LVM, but I don't really know.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.02.2013 22:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Do you have acpid installed/enabled? Anything aside the default
>>> acpi-scripts?
>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joseph wrote:
> Is it safe to unmerge "sys-fs/udev-171-r9" it is blocking udev-197
As long as you don't stop udev, nor try to reboot before merging the
new version, yes.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería
] (EE)
> Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
> at http://wiki.x.org
> for help.
> [80.898] (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
> for additional information.
> [80.898] (EE)
> [80.900] Server terminated with error (1). Closing log file.
>
> cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
> # uncomment when the card gets IN
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Nvidia card"
> Driver "nvidia"
> EndSection
>
> eselect opengl list
> Available OpenGL implementations:
> [1] nvidia
> [2] xorg-x11 *
If you are using the nvidia driver in your xorg.conf, shouldn't you
have the NVidia OpenGL implementation?
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
gt; 0 0
> tmpfs /var/tmp/portagedevtmpfsdefaults 0 0
>
> should I just comment them out?
Comment the second and reboot, /var/tmp/portage will be a normal
directory in your hard drive. However, having only 10MB left in a
tmpfs mount sounds weird; either you have very little memory in your
system, or something is eating it up.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
yes. The
only problem is if you dual boot Windows (or so I heard).
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 04.03.2013 20:42, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> Next systemd-issue (yes, I know ... openrc is there as well ...):
>>>
>>> I get
twork
4. Click the gears icon for the wireless network
5. Select the "Reset" option (last option available)
6. Click the "Forget" button
This should allow you to start from the beginning. You should not need to
muck around around with permissions, it should Just Work™.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
found that 100MB is enough for the EFI /boot partition (but I clean
old kernels immediately after updating).
For the /tmp I use tmpfs (I use the size=100% option), and then in
/etc/portage/make.conf I have:
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/tmp"
This way I fully use /tmp when compiling large packages,
>
> And is there a way to build systemd without ipv6? Or am I going to have
to revert these three systems back to openrc?
Have you tried to boot the systems with the "disable_ipv6=1" kernel
parameter?
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
ling in effect!
>
> What do I need to make this work? I found this:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7188
>
> But CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is enabled and I still get that message.
>
> This is on kernel 4.9.59 with systemd 235.
>
>
>
--
Dr. Canek Pelá
7;ll need to use kernel
version >= 4.10.
Regards.
[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/init/Kconfig#L848
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.9/init/Kconfig
[3] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.10/init/Kconfig#L1157
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de
me. Which is very annoying, but not the end of the world.
Do you have PulseAudio installed? What's the output of 'systemctl status
alsa-restore.service'? Do you have /var/lib under a "special" (RAID, LUKS,
whatever) partition?
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Prof
completely wrong, or a Lennart fanboi, or that I don't know what I'm
talking about. I just will not partake in such a joyful and enlightening
"discussion" (sadly the same conclusion I have arrived for the lasts few
years regarding this mailing list).
Enjoy your echo chamber.
Re
ul desktop computers (home and office) and a laptop. Their
USE flags are identical; I just compile in one of them and generate binary
packages for the other two. It helps (but it's not 100% required) if the
/usr/portage tree is identical (I sync only with one and rsync the others,
followed by
repository of binary packages (they can be
built automatically with FEATURES="buildpkg" in make.conf), but I just
create them when needed.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
ot
specificly looking at writing web apps per say, though i'd also be
interested in any well secured/proactive languages for some internet/LAN
usage.
I think Go and Rust would fit the bill.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers?id=9a52478a2329ffce09c4c1a400934499fcb5ae93
I should mention that I use GNOME. The nouveau drivers have been working
like a charm for GNOME for several years.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
as shit to get done.
Nouveau (in my experience) is rock solid and fast for desktop use.
However, it doesn't work for gaming, AFAIK.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
of other users on the interwebs with the same sad
story.
That may very well be true, but it's certainly not the rule. I've been
using Nouveau on Linux on a GTX 960, and I haven't had a single problem
with GNOME.
Perhaps the combination is the problem; nouveau + Plasma may have
d good riddance; UEFI is so much easier and saner to
use.
Regards.
--
Dr. Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matemáticas
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
tristate "Realtek 8169 gigabit ethernet support"
Say Y here if you have a Realtek 8169 PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapter.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called r8169. This is recommended.
What is more, I'm usi
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Wagener wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Wagener wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
>&
eplace eth0 with enp0s5 and eth1 with enp0s4 in
> /etc/conf.d(net and create two new links (net.lo -> net.enp0s[45]) in
> /etc/init.d
> Now I could start the two network interfaces (/etc/init.d/net.enp0s[45]
> start).
> BUT, as soon as I try to start some service (sshd, ntp
ter).
When the logind alternative implementations are ready, maybe it will
be possible to again boot to both OpenRC and systemd with the same
binaries; right now is not possible.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2013-03-22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, João Matos wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> do you know some guide to switch form systemd to openrc, or keep both? I
>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2013-03-22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Nuno Silva wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, João Matos
annot handle every possible
combination of configurations, so defaults are set for the least weird
cases, or the common case even.
Your setup is not the norm; therefore, it depends on you to keep it as
you like it.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Felix Kuperjans
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 18:39, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jarry wrote:
>>> Thanks, this works (never heard of this file before). But there is
>>> one small problem: n
501 - 600 of 1149 matches
Mail list logo
