as Neil, suggested. The
behavior I was seeing is that I did not set the hostname in apache's
config, but set it to hostname .
On 5/12/05, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 02:34 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> > ive got a network question. i have
I have set the anoymous_enable=YES in vsftp.conf, but it still is not
accepting anonymous users. I have also restarted the server. I have
tried both anonymous and ftp, using valid e-mail addresses as
passwords. Is there another step I am missing to properly enable this?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Along the lines others have suggested, with using du to what is taking
up all of your space, another useful technique I found is to use the
KFileSizeView in Konquerer. It gives you a very nice visual of what is
taking up how much relative space on the harddrive.
On 5/13/05, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED
would override your command.
I have checked, and it is only set once, to YES.
> On 5/13/05, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have set the anoymous_enable=YES in vsftp.conf, but it still is not
> > accepting anonymous users. I have also restarted the server. I have
With the following vhost.conf, I'm getting an error "DocumentRoot must
be a directory", and the two document roots I'm using do, in fact,
exist. Does anyone know why Apache2 would think they are not
directories?
NameVirtualHost *
ServerName www.ironfroggy.com
ServerAlias ironfroggy.com www.ironfr
I've gotten it all set up just fine now, although I think I need to
read more up on the Directory settings, for some more fine-grained
permissions, but it works now. Thanks for the suggestions everyone.
On 5/15/05, sIbOk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look to this thread, maybe it helps to yo
I'm trying to create an updated ebuild for treeline-0.12.0, to take
advantage of the new install scripts it uses. I'm having a bit of
trouble generating a digest, however, with ebuild digest. It is
complaining that part of the name or the version is missing, and then
that PF is null or "", and it b
On 5/17/05, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:45:05 -0400
> Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to create an updated ebuild for treeline-0.12.0, to take
> > advantage of the new install scripts it uses. I'm having
This is a shame, for sure. Being able to build binary packages with
portage, that can include such meta-information, would be a huge asset
to using gentoo as a meta-distribution, as it is so often claimed to
be.
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 18:01 -0500
KimDaBa is an exccelent way to organize a large collection of images.
On 6/6/05, Oscar Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I tried f-spot it crashed on me, it didn't matter what versions of
>
> f-spot and mono I ran... :(
> It might have been a User Error (tm)... :-)
>
> måndagen den
I've been having some trouble with portage for over a month now, but
I've also been in the middle of a move across several states. Finally
having my box set up again, I'm ready to tackle the strange issues I'm
finding. I need some help, I've gotten some of the problems out of the
way, but they alwa
Well, everything went fine until I tried to install k3b again, and I still get the error about:
Calculating dependencies -
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=media-sound/mad-0.14.2b-r1".
On 4/25/05, Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Calvin Spealman wrote:> !
ie. emerge -C mad emerge sync emerge -avt k3bWOn Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:41:01PM +, Calvin Spealman wrote:> Well, everything went fine until I tried to install k3b again, and I still
> get the error about:> Calculating dependencies -> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "&
/05, Edward Catmur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 19:21 +, Calvin Spealman wrote:> See, thats part of the problem: there is no package called 'mad'.> There is gnomad and madplay, but no package just called 'mad'. I had> the same trouble w
I meant a terminal emulator. Just that with 99 packages, I know
something won't build right. As a matter of fact, just read my next
post!On 4/26/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:16:21 +0000, Calvin Spealman wrote:> A month + with no updates, leaves
After
finally fixing portage so I can run updates again, I ran into another
(probably unrelated) hitch. KOffice is having some trouble compiling.
I'm seeing errors that might suggest the wrong version of Image Magick
is being used? Does anyone else agree? If that is the case, I don't
know what vers
Does anyone know why portage is building KOffice version 5 right now?
Last I checked, that release date was scheduled about a decade in the
future, or some time around there...
I'm gettting more errors from KOffice. I fixed previous errors by
updating image magick (should the dependancies of koffice be updated
because of that?), but I can't find so easy a solution with the
following output. Anyone have a suggestion? I think I'm still
battling with the remenents of the co
The Ramdisk option eliminates the need for two CD drives in most
situations (not a good idea for low-memory systems), and I've seen
others use this kind of setup in tandem with a USB key drive for
storage.On 4/29/05, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've read a little about how custom LiveCDs can b
i dont understand whats going on here. I thought those flags enabled
the use of extended sets of the x86 instruction set, and amd64 chips
are in the x86 family, aren't they? and they support those extensions,
I'm sure, so what then do those flags do that the amd64 can't make use
of the flags?On 4/2
For a few packages, currently k3b and koffice, portage is seeing the
newest version as being 5. These versions don't exist, and portage
chokes very badly on installing or updating the packages. Does anyone
know where it might be getting these faulty version numbers, or where I
need to look to fix i
lay?>> From: Calvin Spealman <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Date: 2005/04/29 Fri PM 02:45:49 EDT> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-user] Portage still seeing non-existant version 5's of packages
>> For a few packages, currently k3b and koffice, portage is seeing the
rt it.
Right now, if you compile mplayer, you'll get MMX/SSE/SSE2/3DNOW and all that crap. Just there are no special USE flags for it.On 4/30/05,
Kiawud <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/29/05, Ciaran McCreesh <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:54:57 + Calvin Spe
azy because I'm just missing something here.On 4/30/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:29:36 + Calvin Spealman<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:| Are the things that are automatically enabled for compilation| different than the things the USE fl
So its automatic detection of the features if possible, but USE flags
if otherwise. OK, now I get it. The way it had been said, I just got
the impression there was something different going on.
Thanks for clearing up the confusion.On 5/2/05, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know people say it, but why?
On 5/2/05, Neil Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
> > So its automatic detection of the features if possible, but USE flags if
> > otherwise.
>
> No. There is no detection. Just assumption that AMD65 wil
Going by the same reasons of client differences, one could argue we
never should have extended HTML beyond the first version of Mosaic.
This is insane, of course. Progress is a driving force of technology.
I use HTML to style code samples in my postings, and to add some pizaz
when e-mailing friend
ASCII? OK... talking about plain text is one thing, but ASCII? That's
just dumb. If you are going to use plain text, at least agree that we
need something better than ASCII. There are people speaking other
languages you know. Thinking we should stick to ASCII is even more a
sign of your stubborness
On 5/3/05, Travis Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not the sender's for now?
Why not the recipient's for now? One could almost argue free speech
for expressing one's self in HTML, but I won't go there.
If the sender disables HTML, no one gets it. If the recipient disables
HTML, then ever
You can put the file in /usr/portage/distfiles, or set its location as the distfiles directory.On 5/3/05, michael higgins <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hey, all.> > I've just moved my work location for a couple of weeks while I house-sit for a relation.> > At _my_ home, I configure my IP addy and al
I'm sorry if this disagreement has escalated more than it should have,
but I'm actually very partial to my end of this discussion. I know all
the reasons people have to argue against my point of view here, but I
just find it to be a rather arrogent point of view.
On 5/3/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL P
Let's be honest, that's a fault of e-mail itself, which is inherently
a horrible protocol anyway. I'm just saying lets do the best we can
with what we've got. it isn't like the bandwidth is anything at all
compared to the bloated headers and redundant repeating of messages in
every reply.
On 5/3/0
I believe this tradition, and other's like it which hold on to old
idioms for little sensible reason, are more of a challenge to the
community values than anything I can say.
On 5/3/05, Covington, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bottom line is that on any technical mailing list, it's tradit
MS? What makes you think I have anything to do with Microsoft or
Microsoft software? My HTML messages are sent straight from good-ole
gmail.
On 5/3/05, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/3/05, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but I
> > just find
On 5/3/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is arrogant about saying "when in Rome..."? Every forum has its
> conventions of accepted behaviour. For this forum. those conventions
> include non-HTML postings in English.
And what did they do in Rome if you did not do as in Rome? They
messages and replying
to multiple messages at once.
Always there is room to move forward, so find the door that need's
unlocked and break it down.
On 5/5/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
>
> >it isn't like the bandwidth is any
to update to said
> newer versions *or* programs if/When! -their- favorite didn't get
> updated for this.
>
> That said, it sounds like a FINE idea to me.
>
> Now, where'd I put that blamed crowbar?
>
> rgh.
>
> Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
>
tched within that
time, if you couldn't be bothered to do a simple upgrade.
On 5/7/05, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:56:09PM +0000, Calvin Spealman wrote
>
> > then support for it can grow until everyone will have updated just
> >
This happens a lot. Currently, video playback using anything other
than glmovie results in a blue screen. Audio plays fine on the videos,
however. Usually when this happens, the only thing that fixes it are a
few 'emerge world' sessions. I don't know what package is causing it,
because its affectin
ck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calvin Spealman schreef:
> > This happens a lot. Currently, video playback using anything other
> > than glmovie results in a blue screen. Audio plays fine on the videos,
> > however. Usually when this happens, the only thing that fixes it are
ld come to the
conclusion that we should all still run nothing but command lines and
pass our information around on FTP and Gopher servers.
On 5/8/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calvin Spealman schreef:
> > 1) I don't see how this should have anything to d
aptop screen, but only a "frame" around a bluescreen
> on the original monitor. Does this give a clue?
>
> BillK
>
>
> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 15:57 +, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> > This happens a lot. Currently, video playback using anything other
> > tha
The replies would include instructions for which sections of the
original messages to quote.
On 5/9/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:56:09 +0000, Calvin Spealman wrote:
>
> > If the mailers follow the proper multipart protocols and also m
On 5/9/05, Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Calvin, you're whole problem appears to be that the email on the list should
> be modified to support your own desires. Posting in html because you prefer
> it. Top posting to responses rather than scrolling to the bottom of the
> quoted text
I've been looking for something along these lines, myself, although
I'm also looking for one that does WYSIWYG based on arbitrary XSLTs.
Anyway, I've looked around and found a few things.
Jaxe looks like a promising possibility, over at
http://jaxe.sourceforge.net/. It can validate based on a sche
Vex looks nice, I'm looking into that now, myself. Thanks Matthew.
On 5/11/05, Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/05, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been looking for something along these lines, myself, although
> > I
ive got a network question. i have a few machines on my local
network, but only one IP. I can congure my router for all the proper
port forwarding for my server, but hostnames is giving me some
confusion. To run a lot of things properly, such as Apache and
Postfix, i need a qualified hostname conf
This is as I had hoped, and maybe I'm doing something wrong, but if I
don't give my boxes a proper domain name, apache and postfix will not
start. They complain about the domain name and bail out.
On 5/12/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 02:
48 matches
Mail list logo
